Wednesday, August 31, 2016

Welcome to the new America: Straight-ish, heteroflexible, and pansexual

LABELS_header

Alex Izaguirre/FUSION



In an eighth-grade game of Truth or Dare, on a school camp in Australia in the mid-1990s, a girl in my friendship group admitted that she “might be bi.” She was never allowed to forget it. The words followed her around for years, deployed with the casual mockery of an Internet meme. The environment wasn’t one of outright disapproval, exactly, but it was clear that, when it came to sexuality, people were paying very close attention to what you said and did—perhaps a little more than you might want.



By the time I landed at the more progressive environment of university in the early ‘00s, the rules had changed shape a little—and with the exception of a few homophobic holdovers, “gay” was no longer considered bad. But heterosexuality was still the default, the thing you were until you had indisputable proof that you were something else. Aside from the few people who were forced to make a point of “coming out,” I was surrounded by straightness. My parents were straight. All of their friends were straight. And with the exception of a handful of Very Special TV Episodes, everyone I saw in the media was straight, too.


And so, in the absence of a burning desire to make out with the women in my life, I arrived at the seemingly obvious conclusion: I must be straight.


It wasn’t for nearly a decade, when I was already married to a man, that I considered I might be anything otherwise. Or that the giddy thrill I felt upon connecting with a new female friend wasn’t all that different from the giddy thrill of a new male crush—the difference was that my brain interpreted one as a potential platonic companion and the other as a potential love interest and sex partner. That, in a world free from the assumption of straightness, I may have interpreted my feelings differently: not one as romance and the other as friendship, but both with the potential to be either.


As a feminist, I’d never been much of a fan of Freud’s takes on gender. But as a sex writer and researcher, his belief that our human sex instinct wasn’t so much for reproduction as for pleasure resonated with me. If my attractions manifested as a desire to turn emotional excitement into a physical connection, why should that only apply to cisgender men? How could I definitively say I would never be attracted—or had never been attracted—to a woman? Or, now that we were considering it, to a trans or gender-nonconforming person?


It wasn’t a “coming out” in the traditional sense. I didn’t have to sit my parents down or risk my friends’ rejection, and it didn’t make me want to end my marriage. I didn’t feel like I’d spent my life to date hiding an essential defining truth about myself. It was simply an acknowledgement that who I was attracted to wasn’t as set in stone as I had thought it was.


When I shared what I’d been thinking about with my husband, he said he felt the same way. “I think most people do,” he said. It turns out he may be right.


LABELS_INLINE1Alex Izaguirre/FUSION


We still live in a culture that talks about gender and sexuality in terms of rigid dichotomies. We are either men or women, straight or gay—determined by our genes, our hormones, the wiring of our brains, or the shape of our genitals when we’re born. The idea that same-sex attracted people are “born this way,” or that trans people have brains that are a different gender to their bodies, have been central to the mainstreaming of LGBTQ rights over the past couple of decades. How, the logic goes, can you discriminate against someone for a thing they have no control over?



But these tight, biological boundaries around sexuality have also served another, more conservative, purpose—to soothe and reassure straight people. If same-sex attraction is treated as if not a matter of moral deviance then at least a physical deviation, then what assumed norm does it deviate from but heterosexuality? If sexual difference is written in the genes, that means that if you’re not queer, you must be straight. And if you’re straight, that means you are (theoretically, at least) safe from the threat of homophobic violence, discrimination, or hoping that an acquaintance will treat you with the same ease after you tell them the gender of your partner.


Yet there are signs that these boundaries are beginning to blur. The last year has seen a succession of young celebrities come out to the media as assorted shades of queer. First it was Lily Rose Depp who revealed, via her participation in photographer iO Tillett Wright’s Self-Evident Truths project, that she identified as sexually fluid. Then it was Miley Cyrus, who told UK Elle she was pansexual. In January, actress Amandla Stenberg told her fans over a Snapchat video that she was bisexual. A few days later, Rowan Blanchard told a fan on Twitter that she would love it if her character on Girl Meets World was bisexual, because she too identified as “queer.”



While each of these declarations garnered their share of publicity, none had anything close to the cultural magnitude of Ellen DeGeneres’s coming out almost 20 years earlier. Nor were they loaded with the same fear of professional blowback.


But the most interesting thing about these revelations is the way they defied the usual dichotomy between straight and gay. Self-Evident Truths, for example, which has captured the faces of more than 10,000 Americans across the LGBTQ spectrum, doesn’t ask potential participants, “Are you gay?” Instead it asks, “Are you anything other than 100% straight?”


Perhaps the starkest indication of this brave new world came in March, when market research company J Walter Thompson Intelligence published the results from a survey which found, among other things, that only 48% of young Americans aged 13 to 20 (classified by JWT as “Gen Z”) identified as exclusively heterosexual, compared with 65% of people in my own age group, the “Millennials” aged 21 to 34.


It’s a statistic that seems staggering at first glance—the result, perhaps, of a very self-selecting sample. But when I reached out to JWT’s Shepherd Laughlin, who directed the study, he assured me that although they surveyed less than 1,000 people, their sample was nationally representative. “This wasn’t a group of likeminded people who found [the survey] on Tumblr,” he said.


The numbers make more sense when you look at them in close detail. Less than half of the teenagers surveyed by JWT identified as exclusively straight, but that doesn’t mean that the remaining 52% identify as gay, or even necessarily as bi or queer. In fact, the survey didn’t ask respondents to give themselves a label at all. Instead, they were asked to place themselves on a Kinsey-style scale from 0 to 6, where 0 stands for “completely heterosexual” and 6 for “completely homosexual,” with an additional option for people who identify as asexual.


The percentage of respondents who identified as exclusively same-sex attracted was the same in both groups (6%). It was in the center five points in the scale that Z-ers and Millennials diverged; a series of 1 to 3% gaps across each point that in the aggregate produced a 17% difference at one end.


The numbers also make more sense if you stop thinking of heterosexuality as a default rather than as a specific orientation: the state not simply of being attracted to the opposite sex, but attracted to the opposite sex to the exclusion of all others.


“I am a human being. I have the capacity to try things I don’t have a compulsion for.”


– Ben, 24

“You know how there are girls who will go out to bars and kiss each other? Well, my fraternity was like that,” says Ben, a tall, athletic 24-year-old from the Midwest who describes himself as “straight-ish.” “‘We’ll kiss each other, if you’ll flash us.’”


Ben didn’t engage in such explicit trades himself, but he did kiss his fair share of guys at parties. “It started out almost as a rebellious streak,” he explains. “There are these rules—guys kiss girls, girls kiss guys. If you’re a gay guy you can kiss guys, but that’s it. I just thought, ‘Screw that. If I want to kiss a guy I will.’ So I did.”


If Ben had to place his sexual orientation on a spectrum, he’d say he was “75% hetero, 25% homo”—a position he acknowledges makes him technically bisexual, although he tends not to use that word. “I can imagine being sexually intimate with a man,” he says. “The idea doesn’t turn me off, like ‘No, that’s definitely not for me.’ I can see how it could be fun. But I’ve never felt an unconscious pull to do it. I’ve never kissed a guy because I felt a flutter in my chest. Not in the same way I’ve kissed a woman.”


By the time he left college, Ben had kissed more men than he had women. But it’s only over the past couple of years that he has started to reconsider his previously taken-for-granted “straightness.”


Part of the catalyst for that, he tells me, has been moving abroad to Asia, which was “a big, redefine yourself moment for me.” Since leaving the U.S., “I have tried and done so many new things, challenged so many of my assumptions about myself, and that’s come right back around to [me questioning my] sexuality. If I can be so many other things I thought I wasn’t—if I can be outgoing, if I can stand up for myself instead of avoiding conflict—why is sexuality exempt from that?”


But it was also a sense of curiosity and not wanting be boxed in. As Ben puts it, “The only thing stopping me is I don’t feel a compulsion of it like I did with women. But I am a human being. I have the capacity to try things I don’t have a compulsion for.” He might also have the capacity to like them.


LABELS_INLINE2


If the ambivalence towards same-sex attraction in the 1990s could be summed up by Seinfeld’s “not that there’s anything wrong with that,” the emerging ethos of the mid-2010s may be best captured by 14-year-old Girl Meets World star Rowan Blanchard.



When Blanchard announced that she identified as queer, it wasn’t because she was specifically attracted to girls. It was because she couldn’t say she never would be attracted to a girl. As she explained it on Twitter: “in my life-only ever liked boys however i personally dont wanna label myself as straight gay or whatever so i am not gonna give myself labels to stick with – just existing.” (sic) Later, she clarified to a curious interlocutor that she was “open to liking any gender in the future.”


It’s not just the more hetero young folks who think like Blanchard. Morgan, a 17-year-old high school senior in the suburban northeast, started identifying as a lesbian when she was 14 and has been dating her girlfriend for seven months. But recently, the label has left her feeling boxed in.


“When I started to question my sexual orientation, I had three categories to choose from: straight, bisexual, and gay,” she tells me. “Lesbian was the one that fit me best, but over time, I realized there was no reason to put myself in a bubble. Even if I do feel a stronger attraction to one specific sex, it shouldn’t limit who I end up falling in love with.”


Morgan’s dissatisfaction with traditional sexual labels is shared by a lot of the kids she goes to school with. “I’m in the Sexuality and Gender Awareness club in my school, and I’ve seen that a lot of people there don’t really identify as gay,” she says. “We have a lot of kids who identify as pansexual, or who don’t put labels on themselves.”


Part of the reason they think about sexuality this way, she says, is because of the increased education on LGBTQ issues that is taking place online. “When you hear directly from people who identify as pansexual, you realize that there are alternatives [to the old categories].”


This theme of going online to find words to describe your desires was one that came up often amongst the youngest people I spoke with. Demi, a 16-year-old from the Netherlands, told me the thrill of recognition she felt when she first came across the word “heteroflexible”—“like, whoa, that is me,” she said. “I always felt like there wasn’t a word that described how I felt. But from the moment I identified as heteroflexible I felt happier, like I knew myself a little better.”


“If everyone was really as queer as they all say they were, we wouldn’t have heterosexual dominance, which we do.”


– Suzanna Walters, author of The Tolerance Trap

Niahda, a bubbly 18-year-old from Chicago who vacillates between heteroflexible and bi, turned to Google to investigate different types of sexual orientations, in search of the one that best described her. But, she stressed, “I don’t think that anyone from any social media network has made me believe I’m anything other than what I already knew about myself.” Describing the process she went through to label herself, she said: “It’s all about knowing how you feel, and researching that.”


But just because an infinite vocabulary of sexual orientations exists on Google doesn’t mean that the opportunity to identify with or embody them exists equally for everyone. I’ve spent much of the past year traveling to colleges across the United States, talking to students about what they’re thinking and hearing about sex. And for all the talk of the youngest generation’s progressive new world, many of the concerns we have feel surprisingly old-fashioned—even within the highly self-selecting space of people who attend extracurricular discussions about the sociology of sex. At one talk I gave, an hour outside of New York City, only one person in the room raised their hand to say she’d ever been in a same-sex relationship. At another talk, in a mid-sized Midwestern city, a young man spoke about having to hide his sexual orientation on social media for fear that people in the small town he’d grown up with would find out he was gay. To say nothing of the millions of young Americans who never make it to this kind of progressive environment at all.


The new sexual fluidity also has a gender gap, it seems. The JWT survey found no difference in the proportion of male and female Gen Zers who identified as exclusively straight. But it feels notable, for example, that for all the young female celebrities talking in the media about sexual fluidity, young male stars aren’t clamoring to do the same.


One Direction may have teased their fans with homoerotic subtext in their music videos (and been the subject of countless erotic fan fictions for it), but the closest Harry Styles has come to a Miley Cyrus-style declaration of pansexuality was jokingly telling bandmate Niall Horan not to “knock” sex with men “until you’ve tried it.” Justin Bieber, despite his recent experiments with glam-rock androgyny, rushed to reassure fans he was “not gay” after sharing a video of him kissing a male friend on the cheek. As they might have said back in the 1990s, “not that there’s anything wrong with that.” And of the 20+ not-strictly-hetero people I interviewed for this piece, only three of them were cisgender men. Finding them was like searching for needles in a haystack.


“My male friends would either identify as heterosexual or gay. There is no in between for them,” she observes. “I only have one male friend who is like, ‘I’m bisexual.’” That’s not necessarily because they are homophobic, she thinks, but it is related to homophobia. “You know how some people judge males who say they are bisexual? They see it as you just being gay. And nobody wants to be branded as something that you don’t believe you are.”


👫👬👭



Last October, not long after Miley announced she was pansexual, I met Suzanna Walters, author of the book The Tolerance Trap: How God, Genes and Good Intentions are Sabotaging Gay Equality and the director of the women’s, gender, and sexuality studies program at Northeastern University.



I mentioned I had been reconsidering my own identification as heterosexual. That I wavered between describing myself as “straight-ish” (because as a cis femme woman in a heterosexual relationship, my lived experience was for all intents and purposes straight) and, in situations where I really wanted to get technical about it, “pansexual” (since I didn’t see gender as the determining factor in who I was attracted to).


Walters was skeptical. Being a woman who had flickers of attraction to other women, or a man who had kissed men, was not the same as having a fundamental desire for the same sex, she said. And being open to the possibility of being in a queer relationship was not the same thing as having the lived experience of being in a queer relationship.


“Of course increased fluidity and breaking down the binary categories is all to the good. Who would contest that?” Walters said months later. Nonetheless, focusing on hypothetical labels rather than visible, lived experience had the potential to “erase the realities of structural discrimination.”


Especially in the academic circles she moved in, she said, there was a phenomenon “where people who are allies define themselves as queer, even though they act in the world as a straight person”— and even though they benefit from heterosexual privilege. “If everyone was really as queer as they all say they were, we wouldn’t have heterosexual dominance, which we do.”


The world’s bigots aren’t directing their hate at married straight folks who quietly note the sexual undertones of their same-sex friendships.


This reluctance to trespass onto territory that isn’t his is one of the reasons Ben isn’t fully comfortable calling himself bisexual. “There’s a lot of me that wonders, ‘If I don’t feel that spark of tingling inside of me, at what point does that become cultural tourism?’” Jen, a New Yorker in her thirties who has slept with both women and men, feels the same way. “I’m still mostly attracted to and dating men,” she says. “I have friends who are genuinely lesbian and they’re like, you shouldn’t try to claim any part of that identity, because you don’t do it in any sustained way.” Not to mention the sense of betrayal some people in queer communities feel when someone in the fold—be they heteroflexible or homoflexible—“goes straight.”


Surprisingly, the young queer people I spoke with were less concerned with the possibility of appropriation than the more straight-leaning ones. “I think it ultimately depends on the kind of people you’re looking at,” says Morgan. “There definitely are people who [use terms like heteroflexible] jokingly. But even then, it helps in the sense that people are comfortable enough to be in a public space like a party and hook up with someone of the same sex.” Elizabeth, a 21-year-old from Kentucky who married her girlfriend of three years in June, says she isn’t bothered by “the rise of people who are sexually flexible or who don’t find their sexuality conforms to certain labels. I don’t think it’s appropriation,” she says. “I think that people like me, who have only experienced sexual attraction to one gender, are kind of a rarity.”


In the wake of the Orlando attacks, Walters’s words have stuck with me. It may be true that sexuality is a spectrum, that many if not most of us have the capacity to be attracted to and fall in love with people of more than just the opposite sex. But it’s also true that the risks associated with being anything other than 100% straight are unevenly distributed.


There is a difference, in privilege and in lived experience, between recognizing your potential to form intimate relationships with people of any gender, and actually forming those relationships. Between thinking that you could hook up with someone of the same sex, and knowing that you would be miserable if you didn’t. Between seeing yourself as someone who doesn’t fully meet the expectations laid out for “men” or for “women” and living in a gender-nonconforming way.


The world’s bigots aren’t directing their hate at people like me, i.e. married straight folks who quietly note the sexual undertones of their same-sex friendships. Or at cisgender people like Ben who kiss their same-sex friends when they’re drunk. They’re directing it at people who live their lives and form their relationships in queer spaces. Who don’t “pass” as straight, and who maybe don’t care to.


That isn’t to say that the new queer—or queer-ish—majority is meaningless, or that these identities are surface-level accessories only. Gray areas matter when it comes to sexuality. They both signify a decrease in social stigma (it’s easier to acknowledge potentially transgressive parts of the self when doing so isn’t likely to result in violence or exclusion), and can be a source of destigmatization in their own right (we tend to be more charitable to people we can see ourselves in). They offer an expansion of possibilities of how we might be and love, allowing us to more truly be ourselves rather than adhering to artificial, culturally imposed limits.


These possibilities are gifts that have been bestowed by generations of LGBTQ activists upon people who in previous generations might never have considered living, loving or identifying as anything other than straight. The question that follows is one of allyship: What gift do you want to give in return?


link to source





If you think you have a STD, there is something you can do about it! The only way to know for sure is to be tested.


GET TESTED NOW. SEE TESTS & PRICES



This feature is for informational purposes only and should not be used to replace the care and information received from your health care provider. Please consult a health care professional with any health concerns you may have.



Welcome to the new America: Straight-ish, heteroflexible, and pansexual

Here’s why you should ask a survivor about her rape

160830-prep-school-rape

via Shutterstock



Try to think about the last time you volunteered a piece of deeply personal information completely unprompted—particularly if it’s bad news. No one wants to be a Debbie Downer or a buzzkill, and so often as humans we sublimate even the most minor ill-feelings for the sake of seeming “okay.” The same social convention goes for far too many rape victims—but the longterm effects of keeping in feelings about their experiences can be far more insidious.



This year continues to be a revolutionary one for rape culture and the people working to stop it. While we still see rapists given mere slaps on the wrists for their crimes, a vocal few continue to emerge, helping reframe the narrative and transform victims into survivors. On Tuesday, we saw one more young woman join this important force for good, and her name is Chessy Prout.


Since 2014, a high-profile rape trial has shrouded St. Paul’s School, a prestigious boarding high school in New Hampshire, in controversy. Almost exactly one year ago, Owen Labrie, 20, who was a senior at the time of the assault, was found not guilty of felony sexual assault charges but guilty of the lesser crime of having sex with a girl below the age of consent. He was sentenced to one year of jail time. Labrie’s victim, a freshman, remained anonymous—that is, until the school petitioned the court this summer to reveal her name in the midst of a lawsuit it felt was smearing its good name. This compelled Prout, now 17, to come forward on her owns terms. She appeared on the TODAY show Tuesday morning to share her story, find her voice, and provide a voice to others still existing in shame.





“I want everyone to know that I am not afraid or ashamed anymore, and I never should have been,” Prout told TODAY’s Savannah Guthrie in the interview. “It’s been two years now since the whole ordeal, and I feel ready to stand up and own what happened to me and make sure other people, other girls and boys, don’t need to be ashamed, either.”


Prout is right that she should never have felt ashamed in the first place. But it’s no coincidence she felt this way—it’s institutional. Our criminal justice system is still largely inept at dealing with sexual assault victims, and the systematic revictimization of these (mostly) women helps deepen the silence. Prout is fortunate to have found the strength to reveal her identity despite a system that automatically assumed she would feel shame and turn inward after her assault. But imagine how different her experience, and the experience of others, could have been if the conversation started with victims being told it’s okay to hide out but it’s equally okay to speak out?


Jane Piper is among the brave women who decided to put her name to her rape. She was attacked by a random man in a parking lot after grocery shopping in 2003, but she wouldn’t see justice for more than 10 years, when her attacker was caught and sentenced. She spoke out in court at the 2014 sentencing hearing where she faced her attacker, and has continued to talk about what happened to her since the hearing. But, as she told me Tuesday, she only wishes someone had asked sooner about what really happened that day and how it made her feel.


Piper will never forget the first thing a rape victim advocate in Los Angeles said to her after reporting her rape: She told her the attack wasn’t her fault. “I never felt shame for what happened to me,” she said, but the mere suggestion that shame and rape are one and the same stuck with her, just as Prout initially felt following her rape as a 15-year-old high school student.


Piper said she obviously recognizes how important confidentiality is for rape victims and that it’s the survivor’s prerogative whether she wants to remain silent or share her story. But, she said, “It doesn’t hurt to say, when it happens, ‘there’s nothing wrong with what happened to you’, and to say that some people feel empowered by talking about what happened to them.”


She added: “All the therapy I went through was nothing compared to meeting other women who went through what I went through or meeting people who listened to what happened to me.”


Imagine how different survivors’ experiences would be if the conversation started with them being told it’s okay to hide out—but it’s equally okay to speak out?


Surely so many victims just want to be heard. That was the case with Prout, who expected Labrie to simply apologize for his actions, and instead found herself in the middle of a vicious legal battle and her school showing “no recognition that I had gone through something like this.” The same goes for Ari Mostov, a young woman who was left with no choice but to leave her university after she realized the institution’s fundamental lack of empathy and understanding of rape trauma.


Mostov was a film student at University of Southern California in 2013 when she says she was raped. She reported it to campus police, and subsequently issued a complaint after determining it had been mishandled, and justice for her assailant was never served. The traumatic ordeal, along with other similar ones reported by fellow students at the school, resulted in a Title IX complaint and federal investigation. In the complaint, she shared that campus police determined she wasn’t technically raped because the assailant had not orgasmed. It’s the kind of experience that could make someone never want to speak about it again. But the sheer ignorance compelled her to reveal her identity to the world, alongside other survivors, in the 2015 documentary It Happened Here.


“[The film] gave me both an outlet for me to heal and a chance to show what’s really happening at our schools,” Mostov told me over email on Tuesday. “To be believed by the filmmakers and the audience adds validation that you still matter.”


She sees herself and other vocal survivors as “soldiers for a war against rape culture”: and Prout joined those ranks on Tuesday when she took control of her story on a national platform.


“When you actually see that young woman, when you see her face, you think, ‘this could be anybody,’ This could be my daughter, this could be my friend,” Brian Pinero, vice president of victim services at the Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network, told me via phone on Tuesday. “On a platform like [TODAY], it forces us to think about the judgements that we pass before we hear the [victim’s] story completely. It forces us to look into their eyes, and at the strength that they have, and see not only did this happen to this person—that this could happen to anyone we know in our lives.”


Pinero, who has worked with survivors in some capacity for his entire career, is always encouraging of those who express interest in sharing their stories. But that’s not to say going public is for everyone—especially when the trauma is too fresh. He’ll ask survivors questions like, what is your plan in telling your story? What’s the plan afterwards? What does your support system look like? Who is going to be there to look out for your best interests, and stand with you so you’re not alone? It’s ultimately the survivor’s decision to go public or not, but these are crucial considerations, according to Pinero, before making that irreversible leap. “The biggest thing that they struggle with is being believed and not being questioned. If they’ve been brave enough to share, still people find fault with it.”


Conventionally, silence is the rule and sharing is the exception. But there are some signs of that changing.


In the coming days, Prout will likely continue to face doubt from her detractors that question her version of events—that Labrie pursued her as part of “Senior Salute,” a tradition in which seniors try to hook up with as many underclass women as possible in their last week of school, which in this case ended in nonconsensual sex. By coming forward about her own rape, however, she is effectively, as Piper put it, extending “an invitation for [other survivors] to talk about it.” An invitation that is sent far too infrequently.


“I think it’s because nobody really asks us,” Piper said. “We’re expected to be silent.” Conventionally, silence is the rule and sharing is the exception. But there are some signs of that changing.


Mostov pointed out that when she typed “Chessy Prout” into Google, the first thing the search engine suggested was “Chessy Prout Liar.” “I think this speaks to the high stakes of being public with your story,” she said. “Anonymity has its advantages … the moment you take off that veil of tepid security, you face a world determined to destroy you.”


Try as people might to destroy these survivors, being vocal about their experiences could ultimately help to keep other survivors from destroying themselves. Now that she’s gone public, Prout announced she’s working with the nonprofit Promoting Awareness Victim Empowerment on a new project called #IHaveTheRightTo, which seeks to end shame and stigma for sexual assault victims.


And as important as it is for survivors to see role models of strength, it’s necessary for them to see that breaking down is okay, too. Prout spoke on Tuesday with tears in her eyes of her panic attacks, during which, she said, she hides in her closet and hits her legs, as her little sister comforts her. Sharing these trials provides yet another invitation for survivors to open up about their own struggles.


“We have this idea as a society that we have to be strong all the time, and if you’re not an emotional warrior every moment, there’s something wrong with you—that mental illness is some sort of fault,” Piper said. But being overcome by emotion, she added, is simply being human. And that’s why asking a survivor about their rape experience is, in the end, an act of humanity. They may choose not to answer, but in all likelihood, they’ll appreciate you asked.


link to source





If you think you have a STD, there is something you can do about it! The only way to know for sure is to be tested.


GET TESTED NOW. SEE TESTS & PRICES



This feature is for informational purposes only and should not be used to replace the care and information received from your health care provider. Please consult a health care professional with any health concerns you may have.



Here’s why you should ask a survivor about her rape

Anonymous: The Reality of Being HIV-Positive

*The following narrative is from one of our HIV-positive scholarship applicants. It has been minimally changed to remove any identifying information.*


It was the week after I took an HIV test that I got a call from my doctor to come into her office to discuss the results. Prior to that test, I hadn’t been tested a year and a half. Subconsciously, I had assumed that I was invincible—I was young and healthy and rarely sick. I knew that my sexual encounters had an inherent risk of HIV transmission and while I didn’t always use a condom, I believed that the risk of contracting the virus was too low for me to worry about. However, when I went in to meet my doctor that day, my worst fear was affirmed: I had tested positive for HIV.


i-didnt-think-i-would-get-hiv


At the time, this news felt like the death of a family member, and I quickly went through the various stages of grief. At first I was in denial—there had to be an error with the test results. I had never engaged in behaviors I assumed were typical of the “kinds of people” who contracted HIV; but I hadn’t realize how common it was for a partner who wasn’t being treated for the virus to pass it on. After further testing showed that I was, indeed, positive, I slowly began my journey of learning about the virus and, ultimately, about myself, including challenging the assumptions and ignorance I had about people who lived with the virus.


After some immediate research of my own and counseling with the doctor, I stopped panicking about my long term health—I knew I would be okay once I started drug therapy and that I would be able to live a long and healthy life while being HIV-positive. I was much more worried about the social stigma that comes with being HIV-positive. And while it wasn’t immediate, I slowly came to accept my status and began realizing that the virus wouldn’t change or define who I am as a human. After seeing how hard my status initially hit me and the effects of the HIV stigma, I knew I would make it a goal of mine to become an advocate for a healthy and successful life while being positive. I struggled deeply at first with disclosure—I found it tough to open up about my new status to potential partners and dates. The more I practiced, however, the better I got at this, and the many rejections I received have ultimately made my skin thicker. I am having less casual sex, practicing safe sex, and continually learning about how to lead a healthy lifestyle while being HIV-positive. Although the news of becoming positive hit me like a traumatic event at first, it has ultimately served to strengthen my resolve and has made me a more resilient and determined person.


accepting-my-hiv-status


I wish more people understood what it is like to live life being HIV-positive—especially the stigma surrounding it. For me, the societal taboo has been the toughest part of living with the virus. There are other parts, too, that most people without HIV don’t understand: like the financial aspect— I’ve had to spend thousands of dollars and countless of hours on treatment. But while there is plenty that people don’t know, not all of that unknown is bad—far from it! The medical marvels in research that have been made in the last 25 years are incredible. For example: I now know I’m going to live a long and healthy life largely unhampered by being HIV-positive. That’s not something people could say in the past, and as time goes by, I become more and more certain of my health. There is very low risk now, if any, of the virus escalating to full blown AIDS in my body and causing disastrous illnesses as long as I continue my drug therapy and regular checkups. The drugs used to treat the virus are also highly advanced—there are no longer complicated drug “cocktails” to take, and the drugs will no longer destroy or damage vital organs like my kidneys. My regimen is only one pill—one!—a day. It’s like taking a vitamin C tablet or fish oil every morning before breakfast, and I have no side effects or risk of serious damage to other parts of my body. In fact, it’s less cumbersome to manage my HIV than many other chronic illnesses, even ones that are generally accepted as common or mundane, like diabetes.


hiv-easy-to-manage


Since becoming positive, I have become much more passionate and empathetic about the plights of others in the HIV community, particularly other young and low income individuals. Because of that, I have been volunteering with a local HIV/AIDS nonprofit—it’s very near and dear to my heart not only because of being positive myself, but also because serving my community has always been one of my greatest passions.


I’m blessed and humbled to be matriculating at one of the top business schools in the country. I have met with and committed to joining my university’s LGBT group. Currently, they do not have active philanthropic participation, so I will be working on creating partnerships with organizations in the surrounding area to make sure we have regular involvement in the community. I will continue and expand my personal participation in HIV/AIDS philanthropy, particularly within the youth and LGBT community, and I look forward to volunteering with nonprofits in my state. After graduating and joining the workplace once again, I plan on doing pro bono consulting with small and mid-sized non-profits—my goal is to provide strategic analysis of their business and figure out how to help them grow and reach more donors and more people of need in the HIV/AIDS community.


accepting-hiv


Accepting myself as being HIV-positive has been a journey, and it was tough partly because there weren’t any visible role models at the time who were open about being positive. One of my goals is to become the type of advocate that I desperately wished was out there when I first became positive. I envision a future where youth—not just LGBT, but across all sexualities and all communities—are educated about the virus, are safe and informed, and have access to resources and research on HIV— including visible role models and advocates that are leading successful and powerful lives, completely out with their status and actively fighting the stigma.


The post Anonymous: The Reality of Being HIV-Positive appeared first on STD Exposed – Sexual Health Blog.


link to source





If you think you have a STD, there is something you can do about it! The only way to know for sure is to be tested.


GET TESTED NOW. SEE TESTS & PRICES



This feature is for informational purposes only and should not be used to replace the care and information received from your health care provider. Please consult a health care professional with any health concerns you may have.



Anonymous: The Reality of Being HIV-Positive

Tuesday, August 30, 2016

Why science suggests Huma Abedin will recover better than Anthony Weiner

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 16: Huma Abedin, aide to former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, arrives at a closed door hearing on Capitol Hill October 16, 2015 in Washington, DC. Abedin is beingÊinterviewed by the House Select Committee on Benghazi. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

Getty Images


In what may be the least surprising news ever, Huma Abedin has decided to pull the plug on her marriage to ex-congressman / lover of his own penis Anthony Weiner after yet another sexting scandal made headlines over the weekend.


The announcement came a day after the New York Post published risqué photos that Weiner allegedly sent to an unidentified woman. We don’t know if Abedin, who is Hillary Clinton’s longtime top aide, is breaking up with Weiner because of the crotch shots, but it seems likely that had something to do with it. That said, Abedin may have simply had enough of her husband’s behavior (see: all of 2011), or there could be 2,567 other things that contributed to the breakup. We just don’t know.


On the bright side, there’s a good chance Abedin will emerge from the split stronger and better than ever—as will other women who face similar circumstances—at least according to social scientists.


Back in April, Melanie Beaussart, an independent psychology researcher, and Craig Morris, a biocultural anthropologist and evolutionist, co-authored a paper in The Oxford Handbook of Women and Competition that seems especially relevant now. In it, they argue that women who are cheated on may suffer short-term consequences—you know, like devastating heartache, grief, and depression—but may be better off in the long run because they’ll learn from the experience and find a better mate down the road.


Before I get into the paper, however, let me stress that some people don’t consider sexting cheating, and we don’t know what, exactly, Weiner has or has not done in his private life. But for the purposes of how Abedin and other women who’ve split from categorically unfaithful partners might recover, it’s interesting to refer to Beaussart and Morris’s infidelity model for insight.


In the paper, the authors posit that negative emotions following a breakup, especially when infidelity is involved, may serve an evolutionary advantage in the long run because they provide the scorned woman “fertile ground” for self-reflection, which in turn can improve her self-confidence and influence her future decisions when it comes to finding a mate. The authors write:


While the concept of rumination is often associated with negative aspects of low mood states, it may also provide a period of intense self-analysis in which a woman can better examine and evaluate what went wrong in her lost relationship and make plans for avoiding these same issues in future relationships.



It may seem counterintuitive to argue that devastation can be a good thing. Especially since research has shown that when a heterosexual couple breaks up because of “another woman,” the split can feel catastrophic and lead to low self-esteem, demoralization, jealousy, and anger—more so than a breakup caused by physical distance or other factors.


However, as the authors explain, evidence suggests that people in depressed states are actually better at solving social dilemmas and can process situations more clearly. Thus, following a breakup, the depression and grief a woman feels can lead to more productive introspection and a clearer understanding of what went wrong.


Not only that, after experiencing those hardships, the cheated-on woman has an incentive to avoid those hurt feelings in the future. Which means she’s more likely to be especially discerning when choosing a mate. The authors explain:


There is an important real-life feature of the game—the game changes in very significant ways when repeated, or if the players interact with each other in the future. That is, a person who fails to win the first time will likely not use the same strategy again.



The point is not that a man’s infidelity is a women’s fault, or that her mate selection skills are poor. The authors simply argue that, in future dating situations, women who’ve been cheated on will develop particularly astute strategies when it comes to finding a mate who suits them. But does this mean they’re are better off? Or are they simply surviving post heartbreak?


Morris’ previous research has suggested that men and women handle breakups differently. For example, in one study, women were twice as likely to report a drop in self-esteem after a split as men were. However, women were also more likely than men to report a “silver lining” after a breakup, which included increased personal awareness and personal growth. This personal growth is key, as it suggests women do come out the other side better off than they were before.


As Beaussart and Morris explain in their paper:


While this process is not without pain and grief, the knowledge gained could potentially help a woman rise above the failed relationship and move on as a stronger and more competitive woman in search of a better mate.



Of course, all of this is just an evolutionary theory about how women may have adapted to handle breakups and infidelity. Which is why I want to turn to a different study conducted by Morris, in which he surveyed 5,705 men and women from 96 countries about their breakups and how they recovered.


Following a split, women reported more emotional and physical pain than men did, as well as more depression, fear, and anxiety. So in the short term, they were worse off. However, in the long term, the women were able to emotionally heal from the breakup more so than the men who tended to “recover” by finding another mate. Kind of like a bandaid on a bullet hole. (Again, that was the trend—the finding obviously doesn’t mean no men recover from breakups.)


Similar to this finding, a 2015 study published in the Journal of Family Psychology found that arguably the worst breakup of all—divorce—can actually provide a happiness boost for some women. Specifically, the researchers found that women in low-quality marriages were happier post-divorce than women in comparable relationships who chose to stay married.


In other words, even though breaking up is miserable and can lead to bouts of depression, anxiety, and grief, staying in a bad relationship can be more miserable in the long run.


So while Abedin might have a hard couple months ahead of her, there’s a good chance she’ll come out of this morass stronger than before.


“Mate loss via [another woman] can result in significant psychological distress and decreased life satisfaction in the short term while also providing the ‘loser’ with opportunities for long-term personal growth,” explain Beaussart and Morris in their paper.


As for Weiner, however, it’s not looking so good.


“Women seem to recover from breakups faster than men and report an overall ‘silver lining’ of increased self-awareness and ‘relationship intelligence that men do not,” write Beaussart and Morris.


In layman’s terms? The Weiner may not take all.


link to source





If you think you have a STD, there is something you can do about it! The only way to know for sure is to be tested.


GET TESTED NOW. SEE TESTS & PRICES



This feature is for informational purposes only and should not be used to replace the care and information received from your health care provider. Please consult a health care professional with any health concerns you may have.



Why science suggests Huma Abedin will recover better than Anthony Weiner

How a thrift-store tank top changed my life

160830-shirt-story

Elena Scotti/FUSION



It was a sweltering summer, even by New York City standards. The subways felt like the world’s filthiest saunas, and any confined space without air-conditioning immediately became a health hazard. I was 25 years old, and I had just moved into a decaying brownstone in Greenpoint, Brooklyn, with holes in the floorboards and a broken front door. I heard rumors that my former neighbors had been Breaking Bad-style drug cooks and fled without a trace. Just a few years out of the recession, the economy was slowly starting to rebound and I was paying my rent by working odd jobs, mostly in fashion—copywriting, answering phones, and other assorted gigs.



The industry seemed like a dazzling world far from my mundane existence, and I savored every glossy magazine page I flipped through or product launch I was invited to attend. Back at home, I would feverishly check the mail for freelance checks—which always seemed to come late—so that I could buy groceries. And since I rarely had more than $75 in my checking account, when presentable clothes were needed for a work event, I shopped mostly at vintage and consignment stores. Combing the racks for a shift dress that could pass muster, or a blouse that would distract from the holes in my pants, rare finds became treasured possessions.


One particularly steamy day, sorting through endless racks of pilled sweaters and polyester track jackets, I came across a $14 black Sonia Rykiel tank top. It had a tiny breast pocket lined with rivets, and was made from the softest materials. Trying it on over a pair of cut-off jean shorts, I felt, somehow, different. The item was basic, but the material was of such fine quality, the cut so perfect, it seemed to have its own life. Rather than a struggling freelancer of limited means, in that moment I was the star of a French new wave film, on her way to St. Tropez. Sort of like Bridget Bardot without all the fascism.


This is the true power of fashion. While the billion dollar industry is fraught with complications, it also holds the promise that, with one costume change, we can feel bolder, stronger, extraordinary. It offers adults a chance to play make-believe, but instead of a princess, you can transform into a confident and employable woman-of-the-world.


I’m sure other women have similar stories about finding a treasured piece from Rykiel, who died last week at the age of 86 due to complications from Parkinson’s Disease. I’m sure many even have memories of the formidable flame-haired woman herself. Known as the dark-lidded “queen of knitwear,” Rykiel is credited with creating the “Parisian look of cool” that dominated the late 1960s, clothing everyone from Francoise Hardy and Audrey Hepburn to Catherine Deneuve, and yes, Bridget Bardot. These women were wealthy, glamorous, and realistically could have afforded to wear any designer they wanted. But I imagine they were drawn to Rykiel for a similar reason as me: Her pieces, though simple, allowed you to be your best self.


Taking the crown from Coco Chanel, Rykiel eschewed fussy formal womenswear for breezy knits and bold stripes, meant to be worn on Vespas tearing through the streets of Paris or marching in a student protest. Famously, she shocked Parisian society by creating a body-hugging maternity dress to flaunt her “baby bump,” rather than hiding it (as was the fashion). Designing for thefragile, but strong,” today she is considered the Simone de Beauvoir of leggings, a radical feminist who used breathable fabric as her medium. When she passed away on Thursday, French President Francois Hollande declared in a statement, “She invented not only a style, but also an attitude, a way of living and of being, and gave women a freedom of movement.” You could easily argue that we can both thank and blame her for the rise in athleisure, and the ubiquity of leggings as appropriate everyday attire.


But the creator of French cool was also the consummate outsider. Born Sonia Flis in 1930, she was the eldest daughter of Eastern European, Jewish immigrants who had fled anti-semitic pogroms to settle in Neuilly-sur-Seine, only to later find themselves living under the Nazi-controlled Vichy regime. Able to survive the occupation by moving through remote villages of France as a refugee, a painful experience she later recounted in her 2012 memoir, Rykiel lamented that “the war stole my childhood. I was six, and felt that everyone around me was afraid. My father and uncles had left, and we women wandered from house to house… .”


This experience most likely impacted the designer in ways we’ll never know, and would be unfair to speculate—but perhaps it made her acutely aware of the need to manifest one’s own destiny. At 17, in post-war Paris, she secured a job as a window dresser at a dry goods store. Here, she drew the eye of painter Henri Matisse with her display of colorful scarves (of which he bought all of them). In her early 20s, she married a Paris boutique owner. Disappointed with the women’s fashion market, she slowly began to design and sell her own clothing at his shop; mostly for women like herself who were career-oriented, sexually and intellectually adventurous, and in pursuit of actualization. In one of my all-time favorite quotes, she once told The New York Times: “I think creativity is inside you. If you have something to tell, you expose it. I never went to any design school. I was so strong in my thinking and my way of seeing fashion, I knew exactly what I wanted. I said to myself, ‘I have no limits.’”


In the days after Rykiel died, dozens of reporters penned obituary pieces. Most discussed the famous people with whom she had clothed, collaborated, or dined; who her daughter had married, or how many of her pieces are in museums. But few seemed to touch on how this woman, who spent her childhood in abject horror, had transcended both her own circumstances and the era’s small minds. As the grandchild of Holocaust survivors myself, and the child of a father born in a displaced person’s camp in a rural German town that no longer exists, I marvel how Rykiel was able to ascend from being marginalized to becoming one of the most celebrated women in France. (A country which, today, it should be noted, is not particularly embracing of either Jews or immigrants.) I also know, as a former outsider in the fashion world, the dazzling allure of the industry’s exciting, secret society, even when its fruits are financially out of reach. I know why it would appeal to someone looking to reinvent themselves—which she did, magnificently.


I never met Sonia Rykiel. I do not claim to know how she felt. I can only go by her words, of which she was generous in leaving behind. But I do know that for a generation of women, especially female entrepreneurs, her lived experience proved that you could transcend a meager existence—the poverty, hate, or sexism that confined you—to rise above. That you were worthy of being happy in your own skin. That you could be playful and adventurous, but also a smart, sophisticated woman.


I’m ashamed to admit this, but I later sold my Sonia Rykiel top to pay my rent after too many months of late freelance checks. As I laid the gorgeous blouse in front of the ambivalent buyer at Beacon’s Closet, to be inspected like a piece of bruised fruit, I knew there was no way she could fathom what it had meant to me—a rare taste of glamour during a decidedly unglamorous time. I also remember secretly hoping that another woman would find it and appreciate it; that she would be similarly moved.


Today, even though I have a full-time job (and fully secured floorboards), I still frequently go vintage shopping. Sifting through the racks is a quiet meditation for my anxious mind. Sometimes I even find the odd Sonia Rykiel piece here and there, and it always feels like running into an old friend I’ve lost touch with.


For me, fashion has always been a sort of lifeline, a source of hope and beauty in darkness. Like Rykiel, it set me on a path to a more fulfilling existence. So if you are ever lucky enough to come across the perfect Sonia Rykiel piece, one that feels just so and fits like it was meant just for you, I sincerely hope that you’ll pick it up, try it on, and never, ever let it go.


link to source





If you think you have a STD, there is something you can do about it! The only way to know for sure is to be tested.


GET TESTED NOW. SEE TESTS & PRICES



This feature is for informational purposes only and should not be used to replace the care and information received from your health care provider. Please consult a health care professional with any health concerns you may have.



How a thrift-store tank top changed my life

Monday, August 29, 2016

Alleged rapist says woman told him ‘no’—but it wasn’t a ‘hard no’

shutterstock_259928588

via Shutterstock


Despite all the recent discussion around sexual consent, some men are apparently still confused about rape. Like really, really confused.


This past week a 22-year-old man named Austin Michael Brown was arrested in Nampa, Idaho, on a felony rape charge. According to court documents obtained by Idaho’s KTVB 7 news, a woman told police officers that Brown invited her to his home back in June to hang out, and that’s when the alleged crime took place.


The woman claims that when she got to Brown’s home, he picked her up, carried her upstairs, took off her clothes, held her down on the bed, and forced himself on her. According to the documents, the woman claims she said “no” multiple times and even tried to fight him off but was unsuccessful.


Now for what seems to be the crazy part: Brown, in his initial interview with police, claimed he never had sex with the woman. Later on, however, he admitted to having sex with her but claimed the act was consensual because she didn’t give him a “hard no.” From KTVB:


[Brown] later said he had thought the encounter was consensual, telling police the woman had told him ‘no’ but that it wasn’t a ‘hard no,’ according to court documents.



Can we just take a moment here to say: WTF?


Last time I checked, “no means no.” Heck, even silence is as good as a “no,” since it’s not an active “yes.” This is why many sex educators opt to use the “yes means yes” mantra to illuminate the fact that consent has to be active, and the person giving the consent has the ability to take it away—at any time.


Of course, that doesn’t even seem to apply here. “No” was allegedly said—and still, the message was allegedly not received.


Guys, sexual consent is not hard. We’ve written about here, here, and here. Oh, and here. Read about it. The reason we keep writing about it is because shit like this keeps happening.


link to source





If you think you have a STD, there is something you can do about it! The only way to know for sure is to be tested.


GET TESTED NOW. SEE TESTS & PRICES



This feature is for informational purposes only and should not be used to replace the care and information received from your health care provider. Please consult a health care professional with any health concerns you may have.



Alleged rapist says woman told him ‘no’—but it wasn’t a ‘hard no’

7 celebrities who’ve talked about vaginas in public

CELEBS_SEX&LIFE_HEADER

Fusion


Vagina. It’s an organ that approximately 50% of the population possesses, yet it’s still considered a dirty word. Something to be ashamed of. Something to hide or fix.


The truth is, your vagina is beautiful. It helps bring babies into the world! It turns on men and women alike! It’s the source of our powers! So why do we still hesitate to namecheck them, using slang like “hoo-hah,” “lady parts,” or, as one old friend called hers, “Topanga”? The only way to normalize a word is to use it, and too many of us fail to do so.


Thankfully, a handful of Hollywood luminaries have demonstrated an impressive boldness in using the V-word in mixed company—or in some cases, in front of millions of TV viewers.


Read these. Breathe them in. Stitch them on a pillow. And remember: Just as men love talking about their supposedly larger-than-life penises, you, too, should feel empowered to bring up your magical vagina whenever you see fit.


Jennifer Aniston


It can be argued that no one has had to justify what she does—or doesn’t—do with her vagina more than the Friends star. For as long as any culturally aware person can remember, Aniston has had to defend whether or not she’s pregnant, why she’s not pregnant, if she plans on ever being pregnant, and if never having been pregnant makes her sad.


In a December 2014 Allure interview, Aniston brought her vagina into the conversation. “I don’t like [the pressure] that people put on me, on women—that you’ve failed yourself as a female because you haven’t procreated. I don’t think it’s fair. You may not have a child come out of your vagina, but that doesn’t mean you aren’t mothering—dogs, friends, friends’ children.”


While we all know where babies come from, public figures don’t often name it explicitly. For Aniston, using the word makes the conversation more personal—and highlights just how invasive the gossip around her reproductive health is.


Zoe Saldana


Saldana is a superstar. She’s a lead in both the new Star Trek and Guardians of the Galaxy franchises.But despite her celebrity status, she knows that women aren’t getting our fair share. And she isn’t afraid to talk about how having a vagina gets in the way of equal pay.


“When you’re born, and if you have a vagina, your life is limited,” she said at a Los Angeles press conference for Star Trek Beyond in June. “As women, we have to support each other. If Meryl Streep does a movie, if Jessica Chastain does a movie, if Gugu [Mbatha-Raw] does a movie—especially if she’s the lead and we see the story through her eyes—we have to be the ones to make those stories a blockbuster hit. If a movie is over-saturated with masculinity, and being gratuitous with the female characters in it, we have to not go see that movie.”


Sure, there’s a more nuanced argument to be had about what precisely keeps down women in various industries. But something as simple as having a vagina could be the reason a woman doesn’t land the role or the best salary.


Betty White


At 94-years-old, White is still killin’ it. With her continued work in TV and film, she’s the type of woman that we can all look up to. In her 2011 book If You Ask Me (And Of Course You Won’t), she sums up just why vaginas are so powerful.


“Why do people say ‘grow some balls’?” White writes. “Balls are weak and sensitive. If you wanna be tough, grow a vagina. Those things can take a pounding.”


Preach.


Cameron Diaz


In the 2002 film The Sweetest Thing, Diaz, along with Christina Applegate and Selma Blair, literally sing a song about sex and their vaginas—so we know she’s not exactly shy when it comes to talking about her nether region. Even so, when she appeared on Chelsea Lately in 2014 to promote her book (appropriately titled The Body Book), she shared some excellent vaginal insights.


“There’s a diagram of your labia [in the book], and for me, the vagina is such an integral part of the body,” Diaz told Chelsea Handler. “We think the vagina is on the outside. I say grab a mirror and play along. Get in there. Learn about it. You’re supposed to treat it like the beautiful flower that is, the delicate flower that it is. And you’re supposed to nurture it in all the ways that it needs nurturing.”


Khloe Kardashian


Vaginas are just as unique as our personalities, and it’s important for women to understand that there is no one way for them to look. In a 2013 interview with Glamour UK, Keeping Up With the Kardashians sister Khloe made an arguably very important point about how our vaginas are perceived.


“I never take myself seriously,” she said. “When I joke about my camel toe or my big vagina on TV, I don’t realize how many people are watching! I’m with my sisters and we’re the same off camera—that’s how sisters are.”


She added: “Then I go out and someone will say, ‘Oh, my god I have a big vagina too!’ I’m like, ‘WHAT?’ That’s when I can’t believe I said that out loud. But I love to be silly and make people laugh. It’s a compliment, and liberating to think my sisters and I might make other women feel OK about talking about this stuff too.”


Michelle Rodriguez


In a 2013 interview with Entertainment Weekly, Rodriguez made it clear how important it is to talk about our vaginas—but it’s really no one else’s business what we do with them. The Fast and the Furious franchise star is often questioned about her sexuality, and she wants none if it.


“I don’t talk about what I do with my vagina, and they’re all intrigued,” she said of the media. “I’ve never walked the carpet with anyone, so they wonder: What does she do with her vagina? Plus, I play a butchy girl all the time, so they assume I’m a lesbo.” And apparently when the interviewer pointed out that was an unfair assumption, she candidly replied, “Eh, they’re not too far off. I’ve gone both ways. I do as I please. I am too f—ing curious to sit here and not try when I can. Men are intriguing. So are chicks.”


Use of the term “lesbo” aside, Rodriguez did important work here—like Aniston, her casual mention of her vagina personalized the public speculation around her private life.


Olivia Wilde


At a 2012 Glamour event called “These Girls”—an evening of deep emotions, during which Gloria Steinem, Amy Poehler, and others read aloud monologues about life and love—Wilde spoke candidly about the end of her marriage to her first husband and how hard it was for her…and her vagina.


“I felt like my vagina died,” Wild told the audience, including boyfriend Jason Sudeikis. “Turned off. Lights out … And you can lie to your relatives at Christmas dinner and tell them everything on the home front is just peachy. But you cannot lie to your vagina.”


You certainly cannot.


link to source





If you think you have a STD, there is something you can do about it! The only way to know for sure is to be tested.


GET TESTED NOW. SEE TESTS & PRICES



This feature is for informational purposes only and should not be used to replace the care and information received from your health care provider. Please consult a health care professional with any health concerns you may have.



7 celebrities who’ve talked about vaginas in public

Saturday, August 27, 2016

Went For Gold, May Be Bringing Home Gonorrhea: Free STD Tests for Olympic Athletes

std-testing-olympics-rioThe access-restricted, campus-like Rio Olympic Village and the sheer amount of physically chiseled bodies certainly could have been more than enough reason for Olympic athletes to hook-up. They went to Rio for gold or silver, but may have brought home gonorrhea or syphilis.


At STDcheck.com, we are offering all 2016 Team USA Olympic athletes our 10-Test STD panel (with our HIV RNA Early Detection test) for FREE.





We know that 450,000 condoms were distributed at this year’s Olympic Village in Rio and that 9 million were distributed in Rio altogether,” Fiyyaz Pirani, CEO of STDcheck.com, said. “But we also know that sometimes people forego condoms; and that even if they are used, condoms do not prevent all sexually transmitted infections from spreading.”


This 10-Test Panel with HIV RNA Early Detection is a $349 package being offered at no cost to the 2016 U.S. Olympians. This test package detects for the following 10 sexually transmitted infections: chlamydia, gonorrhea, herpes-1 (HSV-1), herpes-2 (HSV-2), HIV Type-1, HIV Type-2, hepatitis A, B and C, and syphilis. The HIV RNA test included in the test panel detects the virus’s genetic material as early as 9-11 days post-exposure.







Returning Olympians are encouraged to get tested once the incubation for each of the aforementioned STDs has passed prior to testing to ensure their results are accurate.


There is nothing to be embarrassed about in terms of getting tested for STDs. A small blood sample and a urine sample are all that is needed for the test panel.



View our press release here. 




The post Went For Gold, May Be Bringing Home Gonorrhea: Free STD Tests for Olympic Athletes appeared first on STD Exposed – Sexual Health Blog.


link to source





If you think you have a STD, there is something you can do about it! The only way to know for sure is to be tested.


GET TESTED NOW. SEE TESTS & PRICES



This feature is for informational purposes only and should not be used to replace the care and information received from your health care provider. Please consult a health care professional with any health concerns you may have.



Went For Gold, May Be Bringing Home Gonorrhea: Free STD Tests for Olympic Athletes

Friday, August 26, 2016

The moms I know don’t judge other moms. They celebrate them for getting through life.

160826-emoji-moms

FUSION


Yesterday I was texting with two of my best friends. We’re all moms of toddlers, yet our lives probably look pretty different to an outsider: One of us is a stay-at-home mom in the Northeast suburbs, one of us works full-time outside the home and lives in New York City, and I freelance full-time from home in the South. Somewhere amidst the gushing pep talks we were giving one another, it occurred to me: The so-called “Mommy Wars”? I’ve never experienced anything close. Every young mom I know enthusiastically supports all other moms.


Yes, all other moms. Moms we know, moms we don’t know. Strangers at the playground and in restaurants. Moms we read about online and hear about through friends of friends. While I’ve read plenty about moms judging and competing with other moms, I’ve seen them in reality never. Every mom I’ve ever met doesn’t just get, but lives, thinks, and breathes one of the great koans of all time: Despite the vastly different iterations in which motherhood might present, it remains the great equalizer.


Today, in honor of the first-ever Women’s Equality Day, I’d like to take a moment to suggest that a big part of the reason the young moms I know are so supportive of one another is because, compared to many other Western countries, being a mother in this country is really, really hard.


In an official proclamation Thursday night, President Obama revealed that he was designating August 26—the anniversary of the 19th Amendment, which gave women the right to vote—as America’s official day to “pledge to continue fighting for women and girls.” While women have made amazing progress in our fight for gender equality in the 45 years since the amendment passed, the president wrote, we still have a long way to go to reach true parity. We must close the gender pay gap and fight for affordable and high-quality childcare, paid family leave, and access to reproductive and sexual healthcare. We must battle the epidemics of domestic violence, campus sexual assault, and violence against transgender women plaguing our country.


How can moms not appreciate other moms when we face so many systemic burdens to ensuring that women and mothers are not just appreciated but protected—and held as equal?


White women earn just 79% of what white men in equivalent jobs earn, with African American women earning 63%, Pacific Islander and Native Hawaiian women earning 62%, American Indian and Alaska Native women earning 59%, and Latina women earning 54% of what their white male peers make.


A September 2015 report from the Center for American Progress shows that, for 65% of children under the age of 6 years old, all of their available parents are in the labor force, making affordable childcare “an economic necessity”—despite the fact that the average annual price of an out-of-home child care center is more than $10,000 nationally. And a May 2016 report from the same group revealed the systemic discrimination low-income parents face in attempting to access any childcare, let alone childcare that is affordable.


Within the first few months of 2016, 10 states sought to defund Planned Parenthood, thus attempting to restrict access to well-woman care, contraceptive counseling, and diagnostic health services for women who already face innumerable barriers to care. As a result of these legal challenges, state legislatures are spending millions on legal fees and reimbursements—instead of simply using this money to invest in women’s health to begin with.


One in four women in this country is the victim of domestic abuse and close to 50% of all women in the U.S. have experienced psychological aggression by an intimate partner in their lifetime. Nineteen percent of college women will be sexually assaulted. And let’s not forget that 72% of the victims of hate homicides in 2013 were transgender women, with 67% of those victims being transgender women of color. Meanwhile, gay and lesbian parents still encounter challenges to two-parent adoptions, despite last year’s Supreme Court ruling in favor of marriage equality.


So, yeah—women of all backgrounds, races, ethnicities, sexual orientations, and gender identities are up against it pretty hard in 2016.


Which is why, when I see mothers supporting other mothers in big and small ways, I feel so inspired and so heartened. Until the rest of the world wakes up to the challenges—economic, social, and financial—faced by women, and mothers especially, I will take comfort in watching my mom-rades give each other thumbs ups at playgrounds nationwide. We have each others’ backs, regardless of whether the rest of the world feels the same.


link to source





If you think you have a STD, there is something you can do about it! The only way to know for sure is to be tested.


GET TESTED NOW. SEE TESTS & PRICES



This feature is for informational purposes only and should not be used to replace the care and information received from your health care provider. Please consult a health care professional with any health concerns you may have.



The moms I know don’t judge other moms. They celebrate them for getting through life.

The problem with how men perceive rape

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.