Friday, November 11, 2016

What Donald Trump’s win could mean for women with Zika

zika-trump-president

via Shutterstock


The Zika virus was already a threat to women before the election. But now that Americans have elected a man who campaigned on the promise of overturning Roe v. Wade, that threat could get even worse.

For the past several months, women in certain parts of the country, especially South Florida, have had to reckon with the effects of the Zika crisis on their fertility and reproductive rights. According to the Centers for Disease Control, more than one thousand pregnant women in the United States have shown signs of infection so far.


It’s been excruciating to think about the choices these women and their families have been forced to face as they’ve grappled with the notion of carrying a fetus that might be born with lifelong and debilitating birth defects.


In fact, we didn’t even get a full view of these defects until days before the election. On November 3rd, the Journal of the American Medical Association Pediatrics released a report identifying a pattern of birth defects appearing in children born to mothers infected with the Zika virus during pregnancy. This grouping is now officially called “congenital Zika syndrome.” It includes five types of defects seen all at once among babies born to Zika-infected women: severe microcephaly (abnormally small head size) with a party collapsed skull; decreased brain tissue with a specific pattern of calcium deposits indicating brain damage; damage to the back of the eye with a specific pattern of scarring and increased pigment; joints with a limited range of motion, such as clubfoot; and too much muscle tone, restricting movement soon after birth.


But five days after that report came out, former reality television personality Donald Trump and former Indiana governor Mike Pence, who has said that he wants to see Roe v. Wade “sent to the ash heap of history,” won the presidential election. And just like that, the circumstances around women’s reproductive rights got even more severe—especially in the wake of Zika.


Perhaps the most painful aspect of what pregnant women with Zika face boils down to timing. According to guidance issued by the Centers for Disease Control, microcephaly can typically be detected on an ultrasound between 18 to 20 weeks of gestation at the earliest, but it more often becomes apparent on an ultrasound during the late second and early third trimester, somewhere between 24 to 28 weeks gestation. By that point, it may be too late to make a decision. According to the Guttmacher Institute, a sexual and reproductive health research and policy organization, 14 states already ban abortions after 20 weeks except in cases of life or health endangerment to the woman. Another eight states ban abortion at 24 weeks, another two states at the start of the third trimester, and another 19 at the point of viability outside womb. Although there is no definitive gestational age that guarantees fetal viability, roughly 95% of babies born before 23 weeks gestation do not survive. Current data shows that between 67% and 76% of babies born at 25 weeks gestation survive until discharge from the hospital.


If he keeps his campaign promises, President-elect Trump will make it significantly more challenging for women at this stage of pregnancy to access a full range of reproductive options. He has been vocal about his intent to support a federal ban on so-called “partial birth abortion,” a term used by anti-choice advocates to describe the medical procedure of dilation and extraction commonly used for late-term abortion. Nineteen states already have laws on the books banning this procedure. Some states have even started banning the procedure known as dilation and evacuation, commonly used in abortions after the first trimester, as well. A federal ban on dilation and extraction would subtract from Zika-infected women’s already limited options.


That’s why American women are not wrong in thinking that they’re proverbially f*cked when it comes to their reproductive rights under Trump—especially because the Zika crisis isn’t over.


In Florida, the first place in the continental U.S. where people became infected with Zika through active local transmission, the Aedes aegypti mosquito that spreads the virus is abundantly present almost year-round throughout the entire state. That means all 3.5 million women of reproductive age in Florida are theoretically at risk, not just those in the greater Miami area. And while abortion after 24 weeks gestation—just around the time when a pregnant woman might learn if her fetus has been impacted by the Zika virus—is already banned in the state, that limitation might get stricter. Mike Pence has promised to help Congress pass legislation that would make abortion illegal after 20 weeks nationwide.


Florida isn’t the only state where women face the continuing threat of Zika—and real restrictions on their access to reproductive health care.


The National Institutes of Health have predicted that Texas and Louisiana will be the states to see active Zika transmission next. Both states ban abortion at 20 weeks postfertilization. They also have mandatory state-directed counseling requirements designed to discourage women from choosing abortion care, as well as mandatory ultrasound requirements for women seeking abortion.


“The Zika virus and the way it’s played out on a policy level is a perfect parable for the entire fight we have,” Ilyse Hogue, the president of of the reproductive rights advocacy group NARAL Pro-Choice America, told me shortly before the election. “What I mean by that is that you’ve got politicians—anti-choice politicians—who are completely intransigent, even [when] standing before an active public health crisis.”


When I spoke to Hogue on Wednesday, following Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s concession to Trump, she told me that although polling suggests most Americans take a pro-choice stance, the challenge that lies ahead for groups like NARAL is making this an issue “important enough for people to vote on them.” She added:


To vote for a candidate who would decide that he or she knows better than you about what is best for your family better than you do, better than your doctor does, it is literally a vote against your confidence in yourself and your own values. We have to have this values conversation and bring these people with us. We have to have these conversations and have them now.



Our past—and future—living with the Zika virus, Hogue said, only makes that mission more urgent.


“Zika puts into focus what those of us who do this work every day already know—when it comes to making decisions, every circumstance is different and every individual is much more successful making their own decisions with their doctors,” she continued. “Politicians don’t know anything about how to make these decisions and shouldn’t have a voice in this decision making.”


link to source





If you think you have a STD, there is something you can do about it! The only way to know for sure is to be tested.


GET TESTED NOW. SEE TESTS & PRICES



This feature is for informational purposes only and should not be used to replace the care and information received from your health care provider. Please consult a health care professional with any health concerns you may have.



What Donald Trump’s win could mean for women with Zika

Thursday, November 10, 2016

How a gay mom explained Donald Trump to her sons

161109-how-to-tell-your-kids

Shutterstock, FUSION



He’d been crying in the shower. I could tell by his red, puffy eyes. So I pulled myself together despite the sickening knot in my stomach and asked him to sit next to me on the couch. My son, at 13, is generally no longer game for snuggles with his mom when things aren’t going his way. He’s reached that stage when he tries to be stoic about pretty much everything. But watching Donald Trump win the election turned him back into what he really is: A hurt, frightened, and very sad child.



How did we get here? More importantly, where do we go now? I’m not talking about the nation. I’m talking about raising my son.


For months I’ve watched with pride and delight as Eddie turned into a politics junkie. He is, as my wife would say, my “mini me.” During primary season he’d eagerly watch results with me and spout the daily twists and turns of FiveThirtyEight’s prognostications when he clambered into the car after school. It was fantastic and fun and it seemed so harmless. Now, as he wept into my shoulder, his body feeling so much smaller and more frail than he tried to project every day, I wondered if I’d failed him by teaching him to care so deeply and to hope so exuberantly about something over which he had no control.


“How can everyone be so stupid?!” Eddie asked me.


I assured him that the people who voted for Trump weren’t stupid—though internally I had my doubts. I said they were just scared by change. And that an awful lot of people across the country didn’t vote for Trump.


“Can we please move to Canada? Please!” he wailed.


I wanted to say yes. I wanted to say of course we’d run for the hills to get away from everything Trump represents—that we could get away from it. But I told him he wouldn’t really want to leave his friends and his school and his family. He might want to now, but things would look better when he realized that his day-to-day life wouldn’t change much. He’d still have school, still have swim practice, still have a mom who nagged him to practice piano and a twin brother who sometimes seemed like he was from a different planet.


“But the Supreme Court!” he shot back.


At this point I was cursing myself for encouraging him to learn and understand his government. See, we are a two-mom, two-boy household. He knows that the Supreme Court gave his family legitimacy. But I took a deep breath and reminded him of how little our daily life and our family had actually changed after the Court legalized the marriage between his moms. I told him they wouldn’t take away our marriage, and that even if they did, they couldn’t tear us apart.


“Can I please stay home from school tomorrow?” he begged.


I confess, this one was hard. After all, my plans for Wednesday included curling into the fetal position in my bed, turning off the lights, and pretending it was all a bad dream. How could I ask more of my child? But I did. I told him it wouldn’t get easier to go to school and resume life until he went to school and resumed life. I told him we had to stop wallowing and keep living. And hey, there may be new Pokemon released any day! Distraction is a parenting technique that never gets old.


And so, with swollen eyes and unable to stomach breakfast, Eddie and his brother Chas trudged off to school the day after the unthinkable.


Once they left, I began to worry if I had handled Eddie’s post-election trauma correctly—a feeling many other parents I know have also grappled with these past few days. So I called an old friend from my grad school days who is now a child psychologist across the country in Connecticut, Nancy Fredine. What the heck do I tell my kids?, I asked. I could tell her voice was weary. She’d been talking about this all day. But she went on to offer some useful advice for parents and non-parents alike.


First, “just assure them that as adult you will keep them safe,” she advised. “This is probably the first time for many of them that they’ve really gotten invested in something so much larger than themselves.” But loss is part of life. “It’s a learning experience. There were a lot of people who lost. And life goes on. Losing and risk is part of life.”


Fredine also said we need to remind kids—and ourselves—that we live in a system where there are people to provide checks and balances. “He’s not making decisions on his own. He’s got people around him that didn’t even vote for him. This is where humanity kind of steps in.”


She said President Obama’s post-election statement on Wednesday provided good guidance for people of all ages. “Tell your kids we are all on the same team. We didn’t necessarily get the person we wanted to coach the team, but he recognizes we are all one team.”


After such a polarizing, hate-filled campaign, that can be hard for any of us to believe, but Fredine doubled down on the value of sharing this empathetic message with kids. “We all want America to run well. We all want people to have jobs,” Fredine argued “We are all in this together.”


Who knows, she mused, “it could be a really good lesson for kids. How do you turn the other cheek?”


I felt, somehow, a little better about my response when I picked the boys up from school. Were they still sad? Yes. “Did anyone gloat,” I asked, revealing my own fears about leaving the house. “Yep,” Eddie said. “Did you wanna punch them?” A half grin crept across his face. “Kind of. But when they go low, we go high.”


That’s when I realized, for all the pain they’ve experienced from paying close attention to this election, they’ve also learned some pretty amazing coping skills.


link to source





If you think you have a STD, there is something you can do about it! The only way to know for sure is to be tested.


GET TESTED NOW. SEE TESTS & PRICES



This feature is for informational purposes only and should not be used to replace the care and information received from your health care provider. Please consult a health care professional with any health concerns you may have.



How a gay mom explained Donald Trump to her sons

How sexual assault survivors can cope in Donald Trump’s America

sexualssault_header

Alex Izaguirre/FUSION



Over the past few months, as Donald Trump’s abhorrent treatment of women moved into the spotlight, many survivors of assault have found themselves triggered by his words, his voice, even just the sight of his face. Though many of us assumed that Trump, and the stress that comes with him, would disappear after Election Day, this week offered up the nasty surprise that Republican nominee Trump is President-Elect Trump. How can a survivor cope when a stark reminder of some of her most traumatic moments is ensconced in the Oval Office?



I reached out to Kirstin Kelley, a sexual assault and domestic violence advocate at Call to Safety (formerly Portland Women’s Crisis Line), to get some tips on how to manage the anxiety and emotional exhaustion that comes with seeing the personification of sexual assault and abuse get elected to the presidency.


For starters, Kelley notes that self care differs from person to person; there’s no one definitive list that will work for everyone, but she does have a handful of strategies she recommends to survivors who call in to the crisis line when they’re struggling.


“One of the things that often happens to survivors when they feel triggered is that they’ll start to feel really depressed,” Kelley tells me. Basic self care can be a good way to combat that depression; even just getting out of bed and taking a shower can be a huge step towards looking out for your well being.


And if that’s as far as you get, that’s okay. But if you’re motivated to do more, Kelley recommends engaging in calming activities that don’t require a lot of focus: taking a walk, coloring in coloring books, zoning out to one of your favorite movies, eating comfort food— basically, anything that’ll take your mind off your trigger and lead to some positive feelings (“One of the things that I’m doing today is rereading all of my favorite chapter books from childhood,” she tells me.).


Should you venture onto social media? That’s entirely up to you. As with many aspects of self care, social media can be helpful to some—especially if it’s a source of consolation and commiseration for you—and toxic for others (in which case she advises a total social media fast). If you’re leery about engaging on social media but have to be online for work or some other, non-negotiable purpose, then make sure to set limits with yourself. If someone is toxic, it’s okay to unfriend or unfollow them (you can always re-add them later). Kelley advises that you should “really think about [your] emotional safety and don’t be shy about saying enough is enough.”


And what about the news? How do you stay informed about global affairs without setting off an anxiety attack? Kelley recommends consuming the media in small doses. “Don’t feel like you have to overwhelm yourself to be informed, [but] certainly spend time getting news from sources that you feel connected to.” And remember that staying informed isn’t just about reading the paper: Processing current events with friends can be a great way to manage your trauma (and, as an added bonus, help you form a community that can provide additional support).


Setting limits isn’t just about your internet interactions either: Having limits in the rest of your life is important as well. “The biggest thing is setting boundaries with people,” Kelley tells me. “You don’t have to take that abuse.”


Having those boundaries could be even more important in the coming weeks. Difficult as the election has been for many people, some survivors’ trauma will be compounded by the upcoming holidays, which can require interaction with Trump-supporting family members—or potentially even one of your abusers. If your family is more a source of stress than one of comfort, make sure you get a self-care plan in place over the next few weeks. That might involve keeping your visit short—just a day trip rather than a full weekend, perhaps—or making plans to stay at a hotel or with friends rather than spending the night in your parents’ home. Just as important: Look up the info for your local crisis line and be sure to keep them on speed dial. If you find yourself overwhelmed by anything, they’ll be able to offer support and brainstorm even more coping strategies that’ll help you get through the holidays.


The most important thing is to take things one step at a time, and one day at a time. As long as you’re doing something to protect and care for yourself—even if it’s something small—that’s an important step. Though it may not always seem like much, the mere act of surviving, of continuing to be here and refusing to be destroyed by abusive forces, is a display of strength.


And don’t ever be afraid to reach out and ask for help. “As a country there’s a lot of shame around taking care of mental health needs,” says Kelley. There’s major stigma around it. But today is a good day for it. Call your therapist if you’ve got one, find friends if you can.” There are networks of support all around us; don’t be shy about making use of them.


Lastly: Though it may be cold comfort in the wake of a painful election, Kelley urges survivors to “try and remember it was a close a election. It’s not everybody. … Half of this country is still full of people who said no to the toxicity and the abuse. So find them.”


link to source





If you think you have a STD, there is something you can do about it! The only way to know for sure is to be tested.


GET TESTED NOW. SEE TESTS & PRICES



This feature is for informational purposes only and should not be used to replace the care and information received from your health care provider. Please consult a health care professional with any health concerns you may have.



How sexual assault survivors can cope in Donald Trump’s America

Did California just reclassify rape as a non-violent crime?

shutterstock_342999173

via Shutterstock


Don’t believe everything you read on the internet, folks. After Tuesday’s election, a tweet circulated claiming Californians voted to reclassify rape as a non-violent crime with a measure known as Proposition 57—causing many of us sink even deeper into our depressive stupors.



The problem is, this tweet is 100% incorrect—despite the fact that more than 40,000 people retweeted it.


Let me break it down for you.


Californians and the passage of Prop 57 didn’t reclassify anything. Per the California penal code, which was established in July 1977, rape is still considered one of 23 violent felonies in the state. What Prop 57 did was allow for people convicted of non-violent felonies to be granted earlier parole, explained Paul Takakjian, a criminal defense attorney in Southern California.


So how did rape enter the conversation?


Prop 57 aims to help solve California’s overcrowded prison problem by enacting three significant changes: (1) sending fewer juveniles to adult courtrooms, (2) allowing easier parole for felons who have not been convicted of one of California’s designated “violent” crimes, and (3) creating new good-behavior credits that all state prisoners would be eligible to earn, which can contribute to parole.


The notion that rape would be reclassified likely stemmed from a misinterpretation of nuances in the penal code. As I mentioned, rape is considered a violent felony under the California penal code—but only in two specific circumstances:


Where it is accomplished against a person’s will by means of

force, violence, duress, menace, or fear of immediate and unlawful

bodily injury on the person or another.



And:


Where the act is accomplished against the victim’s will by

threatening to retaliate in the future against the victim or any

other person, and there is a reasonable possibility that the

perpetrator will execute the threat. As used in this paragraph,

“threatening to retaliate” means a threat to kidnap or falsely

imprison, or to inflict extreme pain, serious bodily injury, or

death.



In other words, when rape is committed by force or by threat.


Prop 57’s easier parole measure does not apply to people who have committed these crimes.


Good, right? The trickier part is that since the state’s penal code only classifies some rapes as “violent” felonies, it means the other types of rape are considered non-violent: Statutory rape, the rape of an unconscious person, the rape of an intoxicated person, and rape using a controlled substance—none of these are designated “violent” crimes.


Thus, under Prop 57, those convicted of “non-violent rape” could be eligible for parole earlier, said Takakjian. But these individuals were always eligible for earlier parole than people who had committed rapes classified as “violent” felonies. Prop 57 didn’t change the penal definition of rape.


If anything, the passing of Prop 57 is simply a fresh reminder that California’s penal code has accounted for these “non-violent” rapes for decades. We saw this reality play out last summer when former Stanford swimmer Brock Turner was convicted of sexually assaulting an unconscious women but was only sentenced to six months in jail with probation, and ended up only serving three months.


Following that catastrophe, Governor Jerry Brown signed two laws that broadened the power of judges to officially adjudicate sexual assault as rape and created mandatory minimum sentencing for people convicted of rape. (Prior to the bills, rape was only defined as an act involving sexual intercourse. The bills expanded this definition to include all forms of nonconsensual sexual assault.)


The upshot? If you take issue with the fact that the rape of an unconscious or drugged person is not classified as “violent,” persuade your legislators to amend the penal code—because Prop 57 is not to blame.


link to source





If you think you have a STD, there is something you can do about it! The only way to know for sure is to be tested.


GET TESTED NOW. SEE TESTS & PRICES



This feature is for informational purposes only and should not be used to replace the care and information received from your health care provider. Please consult a health care professional with any health concerns you may have.



Did California just reclassify rape as a non-violent crime?

Free STD Testing: Where To Get It?

where-to-get-free-std-testing


We dug into the pros and cons of getting free STD testing, and now we are answering where you can go to get free STD and HIV testing.


There are many places you can visit for free or nearly free STD tests including most state health departments, local nonprofit health organizations, Planned Parenthood locations, and various college and university programs.


For the most part, free STD testing is funded federally, through non-profit organizations or through programs provided by various institutions (colleges, universities, churches, etc.).


Federally Funded STD Testing


According to the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance, the Department of Health and Human Services offers control grants for preventative health services for sexually transmitted diseases via the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). This funding may be applied for by an eligible “state or authorized subdivision including American Indian/Alaska Native tribal governments or tribal organizations located wholly or in part within their boundaries, academic institutions, and public health organizations.” In 2016 and 2017, the allotted assistance to cooperative agreements is estimated to be approximately $98,904,456 for each year.


These grants for STD testing and preventative care are given to places like state health organizations and clinics, which in turn are able to offer free or low cost STD testing services.


Sexually transmitted infections and diseases cost the government a lot of money every year. In fact, a 2013 report from the National Institutes of Health found that the diagnosis and treatment of chlamydia alone in 2008 in the United States cost more than $516,000,000, and that gonorrhea cost more than $162,000,000 in the same year.



Planned Parenthood


Due to funding from the government, as well as other sources, Planned Parenthood is able to offer free or low cost STD testing services to certain individuals, especially those whose income levels are below the poverty level. Individuals on Medicaid are typically eligible for free STD/STI testing at Planned Parenthood locations. Planned Parenthood also accepts numerous forms of insurance.


According to Planned Parenthood, they conduct STD tests in several manners:


  • Physical Exams – During a physical exam at Planned Parenthood, a physician “may look at your genitals and/or your anus for any signs of an infection, such as a rash, discharge, sores, or warts. For women, this exam can be similar to a pelvic exam.”

  • Blood Sample – You may have a blood sample drawn that will be tested for specific STDs.

  • Urine Sample – A urine sample may be collected to test for specific STDs.

  • Swab Sample – A sample of discharge, tissue, cell matter or fluid, or saliva may be collected to be tested for specific STDs.

Because Planned Parenthood locations are reporductive health centers, they test for a large variety of sexually transmitted infections. The common STDs can be tested for here, including HIV, chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, herpes, hepatitis B and C, and other infections like public lice (crabs), trichomoniasis, HPV (testing for women) and Molluscum contagiosum.



Local Health Departments


Federal and state funding trickle down to local (city or county) health departments to allow them to offer free or low cost testing for sexually transmitted infections. Sometimes local health departments have a fee associated with STD testing or discounted prices for certain STD tests, but often STD testing can be found for free (especially HIV tests). Some health departments only test for a few of the common STDs. Rather than being able to get tested for 8 or 10 different STDs, you may only be able to get tested for 3 or 4 STDs at a local health department. Occasionally, testing is provided based on an income slide scale, so you pay an amount for the testing that varies depending upon your income.


Local health departments’ testing options vary widely from location to location. Some departments may offer only blood and urine STD tests, some may offer rapid tests, some may offer swab testing. All local health departments that offer STD testing will offer HIV testing. Chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis and hepatitis C testing is typically standard as well. Herpes testing is sometimes offered, but may only be for genital cases of herpes.



Nonprofit Organizations


There are many nonprofit organizations that offer free STD or HIV testing clinics. Numerous cities have local health clinics that are run by LGBT groups and programs, religious organizations, and other community programs that provide free testing services. Like health departments, these facilities’ testing services will vary from site to site, and so will their methods of STD testing. Nearly all nonprofit organizations that offer health testing offer HIV testing. Additionally, they may offer other STD tests, like hepatitis C or common bacterial infections like chlamydia and gonorrhea.


Nonprofit organizations receive funding from various resources, including federal grants, donations, fundraising, and other resources.



Colleges and Universities


Many higher education institutions offer students free or low cost HIV and STD testing. College and university students are a crucial group in terms STD testing as 50% of all STDs are contracted by individuals between the ages of 18 and 24, as such, many academic institutions provide testing services or have free or low cost resources available to suggest to students.


Like health departments and nonprofit organizations, college and university programs and  facilities’ testing services will vary from site to site, and so will their methods of STD testing. Types of testing most frequently offered for free through college and university testing programs include HIV tests, chlamydia and gonorrhea. Other STD tests may be available, or you may be directed to a local health department for more comprehensive testing options.



These facilities or programs often offer more than just STD testing. Many of them also offer free or discounted condoms or other barrier forms of protection, like dental dams or female condoms. They may also provide birth control or well women exams. It is important to call to find out exactly what services are rendered and what kind of STD testing is available at a free STD clinic or center near you; you do not want to miss out on comprehensive testing and it may be a deciding factor on where you go if certain centers require physical exams rather than just giving a blood and/or urine sample.


To get a 10-test panel that checks for 10 common STDs via a blood sample and a urine test, go here.


The post Free STD Testing: Where To Get It? appeared first on STD Exposed – Sexual Health Blog.


link to source





If you think you have a STD, there is something you can do about it! The only way to know for sure is to be tested.


GET TESTED NOW. SEE TESTS & PRICES



This feature is for informational purposes only and should not be used to replace the care and information received from your health care provider. Please consult a health care professional with any health concerns you may have.



Free STD Testing: Where To Get It?

Wednesday, November 9, 2016

President Trump is a disaster for transgender people

transrights_rouser

via Shutterstock



I wish that a Donald Trump presidency were more of a surprise. But transgender Americans have always known how powerful hatred can be.



Under President Obama, transgender people have benefited from piecemeal progress in public policy, largely held up by executive action and court decisions. Whether they were combating housing discrimination or protecting transgender students or fighting health care exclusions, various federal departments advanced transgender equality in quiet but significant ways.


But all of that change could come crashing down in the next four years. If Donald Trump and Mike Pence make good on their campaign promises, our rights are at risk. With Republicans in control of Congress and a notoriously anti-LGBTQ vice president in the White House, many of those precarious gains made under Obama could be eliminated within days of Trump taking office.


For starters, Mike Pence has already suggested Donald Trump will roll back the Obama administration’s guidance to school districts regarding accommodations for transgender students, as Pink News reported. In early October, the VP-elect told evangelical talk radio host James Dobson that “the transgender bathroom issue can be resolved with common sense at the local level.” He was referring to a May announcement from the Departments of Education and Justice, which stated that anti-transgender discrimination in schools was prohibited under Title IX and, therefore, transgender students should have access to “facilities consistent with their gender identity.”


If that guidance gets rescinded, the issue will be referred back to “the local level,” as Pence told Dobson, which means transgender students in hostile school districts could face even more discrimination than they already do over the next four years.


But Trump and Pence might not stop at undoing the Obama administration’s progress on transgender rights. They could set back the clock on transgender rights even further.

First and foremost, a Trump presidency will have a major impact on the makeup of the Supreme Court, which could issue monumental decisions about transgender rights in the coming years. Trump has already promised that he will “not [be] appointing a liberal judge” to replace Antonin Scalia, whose death has left the court with only eight justices thanks to months of Republican obstructionism. That decision could have far-reaching effects for social issues like immigration and abortion access that were probably on more voters’ minds last night than transgender equality. But a conservative-leaning court could also devastate transgender rights just as federal courts were starting to reaffirm them, building up hope and momentum for a larger Supreme Court victory to come.

Electing Trump may delay that eventual victory by decades. In late October, the Supreme Court announced that it would hear the case of Gavin Grimm, a transgender boy who was denied access to the men’s bathroom in his Virginia high school. If Trump and Pence get to decide who’s on the bench, the court could erase years of judicial progress for transgender rights in one fell swoop. Undoing that damage could mean waiting for Supreme Court vacancies to be filled with more progressive justices several presidents down the road.


A conservative Supreme Court would also make it more challenging for transgender people to marry. A little-known fact about transgender people is that 77%—myself included—identify as something other than heterosexual, according to an analysis published by the National LGBTQ Task Force. In other words, same-sex marriage is a transgender rights issue and same-sex marriage is now under renewed threat. In February, Trump said in an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network that he opposed the Supreme Court’s nationwide legalization of same-sex marriage last year. When CBN asked Trump about evangelicals who wanted him to protect “traditional marriage,” he said, “I think they can trust me.” Overturning Obergefell is a long shot—as Bustle pointed out last night—but it is still within the realm of possibility.


But many of the most hurtful consequences for transgender people won’t come from the Supreme Court—they’ll come from Congress. The 2016 GOP Platform has been described as “the most anti-LGBT platform in history.” That platform directly opposes efforts to make anti-transgender discrimination illegal and it defends conversion therapy, which is still practiced on transgender people despite widespread opposition from major medical associations. Trump has also said that he will sign the First Amendment Defense Act if Congress puts it on his desk. That legislation would essentially make it legal at a federal level for employers and other organizations to discriminate against LGBTQ people in the name of “religious freedom.”

Trump’s promise to repeal the Affordable Care Act would also harm transgender people. LGBTQ Americans are already more likely to be uninsured than non-LGBTQ people. For transgender people, who experience poverty and unemployment at staggering rates, the death of Obamacare could mean the loss of a lifeline. In May, as Buzzfeed reported, the Obama administration even instructed health care providers that they could not deny gender transition-related health care. Those instructions are likely imperiled now, too, which means that transgender people could face even more difficulty accessing mental health care, hormone therapy, and surgical treatment.

Of course, some anti-transgender effects of a Trump presidency could be due to simple inaction on issues like public health. In 2000, Mike Pence wanted to cut HIV/AIDS funding and spend it on conversion therapy instead. While he was governor of Indiana, Pence waited more than two months to lift a needle exchange ban after HIV began spreading among intravenous drug users in southern Indiana. Pence also cut spending for public health programs as governor. And according to the Washington Post’s David Fahrenthold, Trump allegedly pretended to be a donor at a 1996 event for children with HIV and then left without giving money.


If these actions are indicative of the next administration’s level of enthusiasm for HIV prevention, then transgender people have even more reason to be troubled by a Trump-Pence presidency given the disproportionate rates of HIV infection in the community. In one 2008 study highlighted by the Centers for Disease Control, a staggering 56% of black transgender women tested positive for HIV. If the pressing public health needs of the transgender community remain in the shadows—or worse, if public health funding gets slashed during the Trump administration—the repercussions will be tragic.

Ultimately, the worst-case scenario for transgender people under President Trump would be even more dystopian than our present. The federal government would either nod in agreement or look the other way while transgender people are denied employment, medical care, and access to public accommodations. There is early evidence to suggest that suicide attempts would rise among transgender students if they were barred from school bathrooms and locker rooms corresponding to their gender. And if access to health insurance becomes less reliable, the consequences for some transgender people could prove fatal.


None of these problems are brand new. Transgender people have been facing and surviving them for decades with no expectation that they would end in our lifetime. But many of us were at least hoping that our situation would marginally improve under our next president.

As it turns out, our next president is Donald Trump.


link to source





If you think you have a STD, there is something you can do about it! The only way to know for sure is to be tested.


GET TESTED NOW. SEE TESTS & PRICES



This feature is for informational purposes only and should not be used to replace the care and information received from your health care provider. Please consult a health care professional with any health concerns you may have.



President Trump is a disaster for transgender people

Women are encouraging each other to get IUDs now—while they still can

shutterstock_174200660-1

via Shutterstock


Last night America elected Donald Trump and Mike Pence to the White House. For many women this outcome is a living nightmare, given that the Republican duo have promised to strip women of the reproductive rights for which our country has fought so long and hard.


President-elect Donald Trump has already vowed to overturn Roe v Wade, the historic ruling that legalized abortion in this country, with his Supreme Court selections—and to repeal the Affordable Care Act on his first day in office, which would affect the accessibility and cost of birth control. Meanwhile, Pence has an appalling track-record with women: He’s a staunch anti-abortionist who, as governor of Indiana, made it his mission to limit women’s access to affordable health care and slash funding to Planned Parenthood.


In light of this dystopian possibility in which birth control is hard to come by and abortions are no longer legal, women are already taking matters into their hands. On social media Wednesday morning, hours after the election was called, the ladies of America began urging each other to protect themselves against unintended pregnancy by getting intrauterine devices—commonly known as IUDs—while contraception is still covered under the Affordable Care Act.







An IUD is a t-shaped device that is inserted into the uterus and can prevent unintended pregnancy for 5 to 12 years, depending on the type. It comes in both hormonal and non-hormonal varieties. Without insurance coverage, the long-acting reversible contraceptive can cost hundreds of dollars—which is why women are urging their lady friends to get one now, rather than after the Trump-Pence era begins.





It’s a sad day indeed when women feel there is a ticking clock on their reproductive and health care rights. But alas, that’s the America we voted to live in.


link to source





If you think you have a STD, there is something you can do about it! The only way to know for sure is to be tested.


GET TESTED NOW. SEE TESTS & PRICES



This feature is for informational purposes only and should not be used to replace the care and information received from your health care provider. Please consult a health care professional with any health concerns you may have.



Women are encouraging each other to get IUDs now—while they still can