Tuesday, May 31, 2016

China thinks women need their own parking spaces because they suck at driving, duh

woman-parking-space

Women are terrible drivers. I know this because Family Guy said so. Well, that and when I Google “woman driver jokes” about a million memes pop up showing “crazy women” trying to operate these crazy vehicles called cars.


Luckily for all of us, China has decided to do something about this women-are-still-driving problem by creating “female only” parking spaces. Yes, these vagina-ready spaces are 50% wider than normal parking spaces and totally recognizable by their bright pink lines and bright pink lady cartoon. #progress


woman parking spacenews.xinhuanet.com

According to international news reports, one of the men responsible for the parking spaces, a local official named Pan Zhuren, said that women are being given their own spots in parts of Southeastern China because they often “park carelessly” or have trouble backing into parking spaces. Now, I can’t read Chinese so I am relying on translations, but it doesn’t sound like the people making decisions actually studied the alleged problem and instead are depending on anecdotal observations and stereotypes about female drivers. Great idea, guys!


Of course, this whole story sparked a debate on Reddit Tuesday in which people fell into one of two camps: This is totally sexist—or this is totally useful because women suck at driving.


As one Redditor argued, “It does make sense and there is probably evidence supporting that their female drivers generally do need bigger parking spaces.” Another said, “Men are dangerous behind the wheel because they enjoy driving dangerously, women are dangerous behind the wheel because they have poor situational awareness. Voluntary vs involuntary.”


Gross generalizations are bad for everyone, and I was saddened to see how many people landed on the “women are bad drivers” side, especially considering studies on the matter are mixed. Yes, there are actual studies looking at male versus female drivers. And there is no proof that women are worse drivers beyond these stupid memes.


funny-women-driver-jokes-l-698405e2a6b84192

Consider a 2011 study from Quality Planning, a research firm that works for insurance companies, which found that men are 3.4 times more likely to get a ticket for reckless driving and 3.1 times as likely to be cited for drunk driving. According to National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, men are involved in more car accidents every year than women are (though men also drive more). A New York City traffic study found that male drivers were responsible for 80% of all auto accidents that kill or seriously injure pedestrians. Not to mention women pay less for car insurance, with the assumption being they’re safer drivers.


Of course, there are also studies that suggest men are better drivers. A University of Michigan study found that female drivers were involved in 68.1% of all crashes in this country—however, just because a woman is involved doesn’t mean she was at fault. That same study found that 20.5% of all crashes were female to female, but 31.9% were male-to-male. So … just sayin’.


The real point here is that claiming that all women are bad drivers is a terrible, cliche joke that should be reserved for misogynistic television shows, not real-world policy. And yet, China isn’t the only country to create “female only” parking spaces. They’re also available in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. According to the Washington Post, “female only” spots in Germany were originally created for safety reasons—for example, so that women didn’t have to walk long distances to their cars in dark parking lots—but now they’re mainly seen as sexist among both men and women.


That said, as someone who lives in Los Angeles, where traffic is the devil and there is no parking, I’d be totally down for a special pink space. Just make it regular size, though, because I can parallel park like a boss. Thanks!


link to source





If you think you have a STD, there is something you can do about it! The only way to know for sure is to be tested.


GET TESTED NOW. SEE TESTS & PRICES



This feature is for informational purposes only and should not be used to replace the care and information received from your health care provider. Please consult a health care professional with any health concerns you may have.



China thinks women need their own parking spaces because they suck at driving, duh

Plenty of women lose their virginity years after college. So why don’t we talk about it?

160526-virginity1

Shutterstock, FUSION



In the movie Clueless, the character Tai, played by the late Brittany Murphy, famously spews this cutting quip at Alicia Silverstone’s Cher: “You’re a virgin who can’t drive.”



For any young woman who came of age in the ‘90s, Tai’s message was clear: Being a virgin was bad, one should lose their virginity by sophomore year of high school, and anyone still hanging onto it by their Sweet 16 had to be a total loser.


The truth is that many women have sex for the first time not only after high school but after college—some more than a decade later. But in the same way that our culture shames women for having too much sex, it also shames women for not having sex, labeling them “frigid” or “prude.” For this reason, women in their twenties and thirties who want to have sex but simply haven’t yet often feel too embarrassed to talk about their dilemma. This further contributes to older virgins’ sense of isolation—and like a cruel cosmic joke, makes it harder for them to actually lose their V-card, since broaching the topic with potential partners can feel daunting.


In her new book All the Single Ladies: Unmarried Women and the Rise of an Independent Nation, journalist Rebecca Traister calls out this predicament:


Too few people talk about this, but it happens. All the time. It happened to me. I was twenty-four when I lost my virginity, though I happily would have been done with it as a teen. The actress Tina Fey has said that she was twenty-four as well, joking that she “couldn’t give it away.” One close friend was well into her thirties by the time she first had sex; I’m less sure about others, now heading into their forties, because, as time has worn on, these brilliant, sexual, beautiful women find it ever harder to talk about their virginity.



So let’s talk about it. As with any choice a woman makes about her body, choosing not to have sex until she feels physically and emotionally ready is pretty rad. There is no “right” time to do the deed; only what’s right for her. And so, in an effort to start this conversation, I spoke with several women who found themselves virgins well into their adult lives for a host of reasons—from not being comfortable in their own skin to not feeling ready for a relationship—who shared what they wish the world knew.


(Before we dive in, a note: For the purposes of this story, we will look specifically at women who identify as straight and consider “losing their virginity” to be engaging in penis-in-vagina intercourse. But many of the issues they raise apply to all genders and sexual orientations, and we will explore the unique challenges genderqueer folks face in future coverage.)


🍑🍆



While the plight of the ignorant, sheltered, older male virgin has been forever immortalized by Steve Carell in The Forty-Year-Old Virgin, straight female virgins with knowledge, but little experience, have enjoyed little popular attention.



So perhaps it’s no surprise that, three years ago, when a Reddit user revealed why she was still a virgin at 26 years old, the conversation stuck a chord. In a post titled “Not all virgins are waiting for something other than just a decent man,” the user, who called herself throwawayvirginmary, detailed in frank terms what it’s like to be a woman who hasn’t lost her virginity by her early twenties for reasons other than religion, lack of sexual comfort, or trauma.


“I am not bothered by the fact that I waited, and I don’t ascribe any magical aspect to the first sexual encounter (though I am very happy with my memories of that whole time),” she wrote, “but I AM bothered by the fact that people like me are not shown to exist.”


Her story elicited a slew of replies to the tune of, “This is exactly how I feel” and “This is my story.” But these confessions were made under the protection of an anonymous social network, perpetuating a veil of secrecy and shame around the topic.


The Redditor continued: “I was attractive and cute. I felt I was sexual. I masturbated regularly and loved my body. I simply wanted to wait until I found a guy I was comfortable enough with as a person (and whom I was also attracted to on a physical level. And I admit my requirements there are high.) … to explore this very personal aspect of myself with. Not even a guy that I was ‘in love’ with but just … saw real potential in. Can’t a girl just be picky?”


She touched on a theme I heard often from the women I interviewed for this piece: Sometimes, a girl just has very refined tastes. To quote Clueless’ Cher (again), “Searching for a boy in high school is like searching for meaning in a Pauly Shore movie.” As if!


However, for the women I spoke with, being “picky” about who they chose to have sex with for the first time also went hand-in-hand with fear—fear of rejection, fear of being traumatized by finally doing something they’d heard so much about, fear of giving themselves over to another person in such an intimate way. This type of fear is enough to keep a woman who is physically and intellectually ready to have sex from taking the monumental step of actually doing it.


“It becomes normalized. When you don’t know another way, it’s scary to make a change,” Sherry Amatenstein, a New York-based licensed clinical social worker, told me in a phone conversation. “You get stuck, and then you feel really bad about yourself for being so stuck.”


Amatenstein said that she’s seen her patients’ doubts about their desirability and attractiveness become a self-fulfilling prophecy. “Some women feel like they’re waiting for true love, that they’re waiting for something. Then they turn around and don’t know what they’re waiting for.”


🍑🍆



On top of feeling insecure about their attractiveness, some women also feel a reluctance to date (or date seriously)—which, for them, can make physical intimacy feel like a pipe dream.



Katie lost her virginity at 30. While she initially told me that her decision to wait was related to “both choice and circumstance,” she eventually revealed the root of her situation.


“I struggled with my lack of physical perfection and never felt like I was ‘good enough’ to ever be truly loved,” she told me over email. These feelings made it difficult for Katie (who asked that I change her name to protect her privacy) to enter into a serious romantic relationship for many years.


As she entered into her fourth decade, however, Katie moved to a small town for a job opportunity and signed up for some dating apps. That’s when she met a man she felt a rare connection with, with whom she chose to lose her virginity to after six weeks of dating, and who she’s still with today. Everyone’s timeline is different.


Rachael Berkey, a New York-based internet writer, also lost her virginity at 30. Now 33, she recalled that before her first time, those who knew her were surprised to learn of her virgin status. “People were always saying ‘you’re so confident, you’re so outgoing,’” Berkey told me in a phone conversation. “But I was incapable of putting myself out there, and trying to date, or anything else that came with dating.”


This had little to do with Berkey’s upbringing—her mother was a registered nurse and lactation consultant—and she doesn’t even remember the first time she talked about sex, she was so young at the time. “I grew up in this very open household where it was totally okay to talk about that kind of thing and it was totally okay to ask questions and it wasn’t something that was frowned upon,” she said.


But the combination of attending an all-girls high school and spending most of her free time horseback riding made dating next to impossible as a teenager—and left her ill-prepared for the sexual minefield that is most college campuses.


“I didn’t feel in the moment that I was missing out on some milestone,” she said. It wasn’t “until later [when] I realized that it’s like, oh, I’m the only one who hasn’t done this.”


When she got to college, she got the sense that she was somehow behind. “That was kind of when I put that together.” Still, several more years would pass before she would have her first real makeout with a guy—the same guy with whom she’d lose her virginity a few months later.


“I wasn’t necessarily waiting for the perfect moment,” she told me. “It more like waiting for the moment to present itself and being comfortable going with it.”


🍑🍆



While we all have various hangups—emotional and physical—for some, these insecurities go much deeper. Take Delia, for example. Delia grew up with a chronic illness, and the many treatments she received over the years left her body covered in scars, stretch marks, and keloids. Even today, she keeps most of her body covered—an impulse that, for many years, made the idea of baring it all for someone else almost unfathomable.



“My body doesn’t look like an average 20-something’s body because of my illness,” the 27-year-old graduate student (who also asked that I change her name to protect her privacy) told me in an email.


“My body’s been through a lot and it’s been seen by a lot of medical personnel, much of which was out of my control. So now that who sees it is in my control completely, I’m a little picky about it—and a little wary about a guy’s reaction to it, too.”


The impact of Delia’s illness stretches back to before she was even starting to consider having sex. It kept her from going to overnight camp, she said, where many young people have their first sexual awakening, and she spent a lot of time around other kids with the same illness. Her comfort with herself and with people of the opposite sex outside of this safe community was stunted.


So when her peers in high school and college began making out and eventually having sex, Delia abstained. That is, until a second date last year (on the heels of a breakup with a guy who was uncomfortable being the one to “deflower” her), when she decided it was time.


“[It] started as an innocent walk through the zoo and ended with (pretty drunk) sex on a mattress on the floor of his efficiency studio,” she told me. “He wore all black, had a septum piercing paired with tattoos inspired by Rushmore, dropped out of college to tour locally with a metal band, and at the time, worked as a manager at Whole Foods.”


Basically, she told me, he was “not exactly future husband material” in her mind—but he made her feel comfortable and turned out to be losing-your-virginity material. “I found someone who I could never possibly feel that way about (just in case that whole sex=love was actually a real thing), and it was great, and I never saw him again.”


🍑🍆



Along with the pressure many women feel internally to “lose it”—a phrase that, let’s be honest, feels unnecessarily fraught with loss and judgement—our culture pressures women, too.



The Redditor who wrote about losing her virginity at 26 years old says that people who knew her started to assume she was gay when she hadn’t had sex by a certain point. “Because that’s the only reason you’d not bone all your male friends, right?” she writes. Pressure from men is no surprise, but what about the pressure from other women?


Writer Amanda McCracken knows what it’s like to be attacked by women for her virgin status. In 2013, she penned a New York Times op-ed titled Does My Virginity Have A Shelf Life?, in which she laid bare what it was like to be a 35-year-old virgin. “[I] was willing to give up a certain sense of pleasure to avoid feelings I feared: betrayal, emptiness, the loss of dignity and control,” she explained in candid prose.


The piece initially inspired a torrent of angry messages from men who accused her of being “selfish” and “a tease”—a response she recounted in a follow-up post for Al-Jazeera America. She refers to the main perpetrators of these messages as “incels” (shorthand for “involuntarily celibate”), men who blame society for their lack of sexual activity and believe women owe it to men to give themselves over. But more surprising was how much criticism she received from women, whose messages, she said, were “equally vicious.”


“They talked about entitlement and suggested that it is my human right to have sex,” she wrote. “By abstaining, they said I was relenting to pressures set up by a patriarchal society.”


In a piece for Cosmopolitan, writer Laura Beck called McCracken “naive,” writing that “holding onto your virginity like it’s some magical talisman that wards away evil and keeps you pure and safe is not only a lapse in logic, but brings up the important question of why virginity is such a valuable commodity.” Despite the peanut gallery’s protests, McCracken has remained firm in her resolve. At 37, when she wrote her follow-up piece for Al-Jazzeera, she remained a virgin.


As McCracken’s story, and the stories of all of the other women I spoke with, illustrate: Having sex has no timeline. It’s a deeply personal choice, and one that every woman must navigate for herself.


“Do whatever you feel comfortable with,” Sherry Amatenstein advises her patients. “Make your own decisions—not based on peer pressure, but what feels comfortable for you.


“We’re so pushed into reaching these benchmarks. And really, why should any of that matter?”


link to source





If you think you have a STD, there is something you can do about it! The only way to know for sure is to be tested.


GET TESTED NOW. SEE TESTS & PRICES



This feature is for informational purposes only and should not be used to replace the care and information received from your health care provider. Please consult a health care professional with any health concerns you may have.



Plenty of women lose their virginity years after college. So why don’t we talk about it?

How working-class students get cockblocked from hookup culture

HOOKUPS_V2

Melody Newcomb



The lightbulb moment could have been when a guy he just met did cocaine off his arm at 3 a.m. on a Tuesday. Or it may have been a few hours later, at sunrise, when he realized he was fucking a stranger from Grindr while a handful of other college students were passed out next to them in the living room. Or maybe it was the lethal hangover besieging his body when he rushed, sleepless, to his 9 a.m. class, only to be admonished by his professor for not trying hard enough.



But ultimately, Dillon Johnson says, his wake-up call was a sobering family meeting. He was in the middle of sophomore year at Arizona State University when his grandparents, who had been paying for his living expenses and tuition, began to have financial problems. Up until that point, he’d been doing “what you’re supposed to do” at ASU—partying three or four nights a week, having enough casual sex that his friends playfully called him “Slutty Dillon.” Now it was dawning on him that he’d have to pay his own way through college. Suddenly, drunken hookups seemed like cash down the drain.


“I started to think of every single class as something that costs money,” he said. After that night, he thought, “Let me not fuck up my education.”


The fantasy of being a college student in America is that your parents will send you off to a capsule of academia, where you’ll spend your days learning and your nights partying—which, of course, leads to sex. ASU, a fixture on top party school lists in Playboy and the Princeton Review, is exactly the kind of university that typifies the “hookup culture” middle-aged journalists are so concerned about. For the school’s 23% of out-of-state students who can afford the nearly $24,000 tuition, it’s a place not only to get a degree, but to embrace their newfound freedom by going out and making out.


Then there’s the half of ASU’s student body who rely on need-based financial aid to afford the $9,500 in-state price tag. These students have more important things to worry about than boozy sex. They’re hyper-aware of every dollar they’re putting toward credits or trying to hold onto their scholarships. Some of them are working full time. Some of them are living at home to save the more than $10,000 ASU charges for room and board. And to the hundreds of thousands of students attending Maricopa County’s community colleges, “campus life” isn’t even a thing; they go to class, take notes, and head home. They may take four or six or 10 years to complete their degree because, for these students, life tends to get in the way.


“The media narrative of hookup culture is all centered around unlimited time and money and activities that require independence from family,” says Rachel Allison, an assistant professor of sociology at the University of Illinois at Chicago, who led a study on this topic. It’s not that working-class students don’t have sex at all, they’re just having a lot fewer of the alcohol-soaked, no-strings-attached rendezvous that take place in a hedonistic, privileged campus bubble. “Hookup culture is also party culture,” Allison says, and “the logistics alone” of being a low-income student—of commuting, of working—“are a really big barrier to their social lives.”


Technically, love and sex don’t cost a thing. But on a bacchanalian campus like ASU, it’s hard to overstate the cockblocking power of a working-class life.


🍻💏💸



ASU is the land of sex and parties lol,” a 21-year-old blond Californian Tinder match named Austen assures me. He then lists the bars to go to on Tempe’s Mill Avenue, a Bourbon Street-like strip that Dillon and several other people describe as “raunchy”: Whiskey Row, El Hefe, Gringo Star Street Bar, each with a douchier name than the last. On a recent Saturday night, Gringo Star is full of college students sipping oversized drinks and bumping to top 40, while Iggy Azalea rubs her butt against J. Lo’s on a flat-screen TV. The uniform is plaid collared shirts for guys, jean cutoff shorts and wedges for ladies. Several people I meet there confirm what Austen said: If you want to get some ass, you go to Mill Avenue.



“It’s kind of a meat market,” admits Sydney*, who’s wearing a huge, gauzy hat after just having won second place at a Kentucky Derby costume contest. She semi-fondly remembers her first frat party during freshmen orientation, where she was handcuffed by several brothers. They plunged the key down a bottle of champagne, demanding she drink it all. (She now admits that was “a little sexist.”)


Sydney estimates that a typical night out in Tempe costs her $60 or $70, including a $30 surge-price Uber at the end of the night—“and that’s for a girl,” she adds. “Most girls get the stray free drink or two, or a free shot.”


Working-class, risk-averse students are a lot less likely to throw it all away for a series of one-night Tinder flings.


A couple of hours earlier, about 20 miles away, Jessica Salas was spending a quiet night at her family’s house in Tolleson, Arizona, a small working-class suburb that’s 80% Hispanic. On my drive from downtown Phoenix to Tolleson, chain-store sprawl gives way to dusty land ribboned with lush green patches and then to rows of modest houses. Mariachi music and Spanish hip-hop float out of cars and backyards. Jessica’s doorbell is nestled in a tiny gold cross.


Jessica has lived in Tolleson since she was nine years old, when her family moved from California’s San Fernando Valley after her dad lost his job and heard about an opportunity in tile manufacturing. She went to a magnet high school and worked her ass off in AP classes and a student club that helped raise funds for developing countries. She didn’t apply to out-of-state schools because she didn’t think her family could afford the application fees, let alone the costs of living out of state. (And she didn’t get much guidance when it came to scholarships or grants.)


So when Jessica got into three state schools, she chose ASU because it was close to home and it offered to pay for two-thirds of her tuition. Now 19, she just completed her first year of college while living under the strict rules of her Catholic parents.


“It’s not like I wouldn’t want to live in the dorms,” she says. “I would have more autonomy that way, not be locked up here on the weekends. Just can’t afford it.”


To Mill Avenue’s mainstays, Jessica’s daily routine is unrecognizable: She’s up at 7:30 a.m. every day and doesn’t return from campus until 7 or 8 at night. She doesn’t have a car, so she takes an hour-long bus ride from her parents’ house to ASU’s downtown campus. She doesn’t go out on the weekends because she has chores to do at home and volunteers with a grassroots environmental group called Chispa. She has school friends she made through TRIO, a federal program that supports low-income students, but she doesn’t talk to anyone in her classes because “I don’t really have much in common with them.”


As for hookups, Jessica doesn’t have them. She wasn’t allowed to date until recently, and she just had her first relationship this year with a guy she knew from high school. But it never really got physical. The whole thing makes her nervous.


“It’s not my priority,” she says. “I would like to have intimate connections with people, but not right now.”


Jessica is surely more chaste than most—even though there’s evidence that students of color hook up less than white students, they still do it two or three times a year, according to Lisa Wade, author of the forthcoming book American Hookup: The New Culture of Sex on Campus. (In fact, the entire phenomenon of “hooking up” is outsized, Wade says; it’s really just a small proportion of students having lots of casual sex, presumably the ones with the most time and resources on their hands.)


Still, Jessica represents how alienated many working-class students can feel in colleges with wealthier students. Unlike Dillon, who saw firsthand how ASU’s party culture threatened his education, Jessica avoids campus social life altogether. And that hurts her academically. If you’re isolated, Wade says, “you don’t know which teachers are good, which teachers grade easily, what awards you might be able to apply to. There are lot of opportunities that you miss.”


By forgoing the party scene, Jessica also misses out on gaining what Elizabeth Armstrong and Laura Hamilton call “erotic status” in their book Paying for the Party: How College Maintains Inequality. Partying hard while looking hot keeps a woman on the social radar, and a strong network of people with social capital means better jobs and internships. Students who, say, join Greek life (another cost-prohibitive activity) have a ready-made career pipeline when they graduate.


“I thought, ‘You guys are probably getting your parents paying for your school, and here I am alone with my baby.’”


On the other hand, Jessica is right to be wary of this scene. If you’re upper-to-middle class, chances are you’ll end up fine even if you skip a few classes, waste time on Tinder, or spend weekends partying til dawn and nursing your hangovers. But for low-income students whose parents aren’t footing the bill, every misstep is money out of their pockets.


“If you’re a working-class student that’s pulled into the party scene, your grades suffer, which wouldn’t matter if your mom is going to make sure you get a good job afterwards,” Wade says. “You kind of have to be squeaky clean to get through college if you’re coming out of an adverse circumstance.”


The stakes are simply far higher if, like Jessica, you’re a first-generation college student and that degree may be the only way you’ll improve your lot in life. Working-class, risk-averse students—Armstrong and Hamilton call them the “strivers”—are a lot less likely to throw it all away for a series of one-night Tinder flings.


🍻💏💸



Jessica is reminded every day of the social life she’s missing out on. But there’s a whole other group of students who are even less connected to campus life. There are 10 million students enrolled in community colleges in the United States, about one-fourth of the country’s undergrads, who only set foot on campus to attend class. For them, college isn’t a social or sexual hub; the hooking up that does happen is usually with people they know from their jobs or high schools or neighborhood.



On a recent Friday evening, I meet three of these students in a sparsely furnished ranch-style house in a northwest Phoenix neighborhood. The house belongs to Pedro Lopez, who I’ve known for years. When I met him in 2010, he was a teenager fighting against Arizona’s anti-immigration law SB 1070. Now 23, he’s still an activist and a budding politician, but his education is on hold at the moment. He completed three semesters at Glendale Community College before he had two kids in quick succession and had to focus on making a living.


When I asked him to introduce me to other community college students in Arizona, he connected me with Rocio Castruita and Kendra Pastrano, both young parents who have similarly erratic college trajectories. They consider themselves “active students,” in that they take a few classes for a semester, work for a while to save up for tuition, then rinse and repeat. This staggered experience is pretty typical for working-class undergrads. Unlike the students you’d find within the bubble of Tempe’s campus, college for people like Pedro, Rocio, and Kendra is something to work at whenever there’s time, not an immersive experience concentrated into four years.


“I was an old person trapped into a 19-year-old body.”


That night, we all sit on a gigantic sectional couch with glasses of water while their kids play outside in the yard. Both Pedro and Rocio had their children mid-college, in that accidentally-on-purpose way—“Whatever happens, happens,” Pedro remembers thinking when he and his girlfriend forwent protection. It’s an approach most ASU party kids wouldn’t even fathom.


Kendra, on the other hand, enrolled in college at 20 to give her daughter a better life. She’s been chipping away at her education for the last six years at Estrella Mountain Community College, squeezing in classes at night while working 40 hours a week, first as a caretaker and then as a health technician. She hasn’t been back since the fall, but is planning to re-enroll soon.


“I did go on dates and met people from around, but never from school,” she says. Her fellow students are “all like me—they work all day, they’re older…they didn’t want to get out of classes and hang out. We all had lives.”


For most of the last six years she lived at home with her mom, her stepdad, her two younger siblings, and her daughter. The full house put a crimp in her social life.


“I wasn’t going to take a person home where my family was, because that’s kind of creepy,” she says. To her, “hookup culture” means “a random person who I just met at a party and now we’re in a bedroom somewhere sleeping together.” She’s never done that. The few casual sex partners she’s had are all people she knows through mutual friends. The father of her child was never around consistently, and died three years ago.


Even though Pedro had more freedom, hooking up wasn’t so much a lifestyle as a rare respite from the grind.


Rocio, 29, is also raising her child pretty much on her own. She got her associates’ degree after six years at Coconino Community College in Flagstaff, then started taking online classes here and there through Northern Arizona University. She wound up putting those classes on hold a few years ago because it was “too pricey”—nearly $3,000 per class. (She was undocumented, and it was before DACA allowed students like her to pay in-state tuition.) “I got to the point where I was discouraged…my bachelor’s was just going to have to wait for a while,” she says. As for her dating life, it “wasn’t that great. I did date here and there but it was mostly guys I knew from the past.” For a while she was off and on with her son’s father, but he was struggling with drug addiction and got deported back to Mexico for a few years. Even now, he only sees their kid every other weekend.


Rocio remembers feeling acute envy when she had to decline other students’ invites to go to the Flagstaff bars, or when she drove through NAU’s bustling terracotta campus on her way to Coconino. “I was very, very annoyed with other college students,” she says. “I had a lot of resentment for these privileged kids. I felt like we couldn’t connect. I thought, ‘You guys are probably getting your parents paying for your school, and here I am alone with my baby.’”


Both Rocio and Kendra estimate that they’ve had casual sex with maybe three or four people in the last several years. “I work a lot, I help my son with school,” Rocio says. “I really don’t have the time.” Eventually Kendra did get her own apartment and brought a few lovers home, but afterwards she thought, “‘Oh my god, what the heck, what’s wrong with me? What was I thinking?’ I kind of felt ashamed.” She blames it on “Latinos being conservative about that type of thing.”


Latina students living at home tend to be subjected to extra moral scrutiny compared to their male counterparts. Pedro didn’t have that problem. Before he had his kids, he had some casual sex and didn’t feel bad about it. (He also felt like he partied a good amount in high school, a sentiment echoed by Rocio and Kendra; some of their parents worked nights, after all.)


But even though Pedro had more freedom, hooking up wasn’t so much a lifestyle as a rare respite from the grind. Mostly he kept his head down, balancing college, work at a pharmaceutical delivery company, and political organizing. He was sleeping three or four hours a night and didn’t have time for an active social life. “I was an old person trapped into a 19-year-old body,” Pedro says. He knew two girls from high school who had moved out of town—one in Los Angeles, one in the border town of Mexicali—and would steal away for intense weekends of sex and partying. But then it was back to his grownup problems at his dad’s house, where he helped pay the rent.


“I wanted to go to the dorms and be away from the house,” he says. But “Glendale didn’t have that opportunity and ASU was so expensive that I would rather save the money and put it somewhere else.”


And he did—into his burgeoning family. Once his now-wife Alessandra got pregnant and they decided to keep the baby, school was on hold. He had to concentrate on being a breadwinner. Weekend trysts and house parties now seem a million miles away.


🍻💏💸



When I met with Dillon at ASU, he was days from graduating and in reflection mode. He told me that after he “woke up” from a life of hooking up and partying, he started working 50 hours a week at two jobs—as a graphic designer on campus for $11 an hour and at the help desk of a payment processing center for $15 an hour. He went from going out a few times a week to a few times a month. He made a new set of friends who were more serious about their studies.



By the time his senior year rolled around, Dillon was hooking up with people occasionally, mostly through Grindr, but didn’t have much energy to devote to it and didn’t have much time for a relationship, either. “There were some times I tried to make [a relationship] work, but they would say, ‘You’re too involved with school, you don’t have time for me,’” he says.


He’s glad he finally buckled down and made friends who motivated him to do well in class. And most of these new friends were also paying their way through school, so they could relate. But he still had a few wealthier kids in his crew whose parents covered all their bills, who seemed just a little more carefree stumbling down Mill Avenue.


“Those friends get to have more of a crazier time,” he says, both at the bars and in the bedroom. He adds, a bit wistfully: “I was like that, too.”


 


*declined to give her real name due to the debaucherous nature of her frat party memory.


link to source





If you think you have a STD, there is something you can do about it! The only way to know for sure is to be tested.


GET TESTED NOW. SEE TESTS & PRICES



This feature is for informational purposes only and should not be used to replace the care and information received from your health care provider. Please consult a health care professional with any health concerns you may have.



How working-class students get cockblocked from hookup culture

Monday, May 30, 2016

The truth about teen moms getting impregnated by older men

160526-pregnant-teen

Shutterstock, FUSION


Over the past few weeks, a post created in honor of National Teen Pregnancy Prevention Month has gone viral—challenging readers to rethink their perspective on teen moms:






Created by the blogger behind Teen Mom NYC, the post states that 39% of children born to 15-year-old mothers are fathered by men between the ages of twenty and thirty. “That means grown men father a large percent of children born to teens,” the post adds, “but teen mothers are presented as the problem.”


This message has been shared nearly 45,000 times on Facebook and thousands more times on other platforms. I myself shared it on my personal Facebook account—right before I noticed that the source of the statistic was from 1995, more than twenty years ago.


Was the figure still accurate? I decided to do a little fact-checking, and the short answer is no. That said, many of the men who father babies with teen women are older—and the message that teen moms face undue shame and blame for getting pregnant is still way too relevant.


First, a quick trip in the time machine back to 1995. That year, in his State of the Union Address, President Bill Clinton called “the epidemic of teen pregnancies and births where there is no marriage … our most serious social problem.” At the time, teen pregnancy rates had reached its highest level in U.S. history.


Meanwhile, with panic over the issue at a peak as well, the Committee on Unintended Pregnancy—a group commissioned by the nonprofit Institute of Medicine (now known as The National Academy of Medicine)—released a report that included the provocative statistic noted above.


But let’s fast forward to today. It’s important to note that teen pregnancy rates have dropped dramatically—a whopping 51% since the mid-nineties. So where does that leave a post like the one currently making the rounds on Facebook?


teen_trends_2010-1

Let’s start with the age question. The majority of teen births occur among older teens, according to Kathryn Krost, lead researcher on teen pregnancy at the Guttmacher Institute. Most teen moms are between the ages of 18 and 19 years old, she says. Less than 1% of teens younger than 15 become pregnant each year, according to 2014 report.


Of course, this is not to say that 15-year-old girls are not becoming pregnant.


So what do the current stats look like for this group? It turns out that 68% of men who impregnate teen moms between the ages of 15 to 17 are under the age of 20, and 95% are under the age of 24, according to Ginny Ehrlich, the CEO of the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, citing data from the CDC’s 2014 Vital Statistics report and the most recent National Survey of Family Growth.


So the latest numbers no longer mirror those portrayed in the viral post. However, the post’s message that teen mothers are unfairly stigmatized for getting pregnant—that teen mothers are “presented as the problem”—is one worthy of exploration.


To learn more, I reached out to Gloria Malone, the blogger, mother and activist behind Teen Mom NYC and the viral post. Malone didn’t deny that her source for the post was outdated, but she stands behind the message. “Men are always excused from pregnancy,” she told me by phone. “When you couple that with age and the ways in which prevention campaigns particularly feature young women of color, they’re kinda banking on stereotypes of women that exist. The stereotype that young women are unable to close their legs.”


Consider this ad from DC Campaign, a Washington-based organization which aims to reduce rates of teen pregnancy in the nation’s capital, which has had some of the highest rates of teen pregnancy in the country.


f6fca2157cf09c7ea37050cf6b412d1c

Or this widely criticized 2001 ad from TeenPregnancy.org, a website affiliated with the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy. The ad features a young woman of color with the word”DIRTY” scrawled on top of her. To her left, the copy reads: “I want to be out with my friends. Instead I’m changing DIRTY diapers.” Campaigns like this one, which traffic heavily in shame, make it difficult for women who do become pregnant.


To combat ads like these, Malone launched the hashtag and Tumblr NoTeenShame in collaboration with The National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health 2013.


“We need to stop shaming young people, and primarily young mothers because it really affects how society interacts with them,” Malone told me, recounting her own experience of being pregnant at 15 and feeling like her community turned their back on her when they thought she wouldn’t graduate from high school as a result. (Malone graduated on time and went on to earn a Bachelor’s degree.) The NoTeenShame campaign also launched a Change.org petition against shame-based ads, and the hashtag is still being used on Twitter three years later.


When I asked Malone how she would recast conversations around teen pregnancy prevention, she told me she’d take the resources currently directed toward these public campaigns and the organizations behind them and redirect them to poverty-prevention programs, since poverty is both a leading cause and consequence of teen pregnancy.


When I ran Malone’s argument by Sarah Brown, the co-author of the original committee report from 1995 and one of the founding members of The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, Brown, who also served as the organization’s CEO for twenty years, said, “I feel for her and all young women (and men for that matter) who got caught up in this and feel stigmatized and so forth. It’s not right.”


But Brown also told me it’s not an accident that most campaigns target young women, because, in her words, it’s a “matter of focusing where most of the problem, pain, and responsibility lies.” She told me, “I’m happy to talk a lot about men, but I think we need to focus on who has the most at stake,” adding, “Every single reversible form of contraception besides condoms is used by the female.”


And she’s right, of course, that women are the ones who end up pregnant at the end of the day. But does that mean we shouldn’t hold men accountable? Hardly.


To that note, Brown agrees that conversations around teen pregnancy prevention should be more nuanced. “It’s not about preventing pregnancy entirely,” she says, “It’s about postponing pregnancy even just for a couple years. Get further in school, do better in the job market, know yourself better so you can have a more stable relationship.”


Brown acknowledges that some groups may have—intentionally or not—contributed to the idea that pregnancy among young women is a death sentence.


With that in mind, perhaps the country’s public health organizations would do well to enlist advocates like Malone—women who’ve lived through teen pregnancy themselves—to help paint a more authentic picture and provide them with the support they really need.


link to source





If you think you have a STD, there is something you can do about it! The only way to know for sure is to be tested.


GET TESTED NOW. SEE TESTS & PRICES



This feature is for informational purposes only and should not be used to replace the care and information received from your health care provider. Please consult a health care professional with any health concerns you may have.



The truth about teen moms getting impregnated by older men

Saturday, May 28, 2016

Anonymous: What You Don’t Know About Living With HIV

*The following narrative is from one of our HIV-positive scholarship applicants. It has been minimally changed to remove any identifying information.*


I am uncertain from whom I contracted HIV, but I was diagnosed when I was only 20 years old. I have often been asked who it was and told that I could prosecute them to the full extent of the law for not disclosing their status. My reason for not doing so was that it would not change anything for me. I would still be living with HIV and I would have just ruined someone else’s life who may not have even known they were positive at the time. Becoming positive was a reckless mistake on my part, fueled by insecurity and a willingness to please people who only wanted to make sure that they were satisfied. At the time, I had only slept with two people who I did not use protection with upon their insistence. While logically I knew this was a mistake, I didn’t want anyone to dislike me and, more importantly, I wanted to feel like someone could actually look at me and find me attractive.


HIV-insecure


HIV has affected my life in many ways. When I was first put on Atripla®, my medication to combat HIV, I remember it was a very hard regimen to follow. At the time, I was still in college full-time, working 50-60 hours at a job to make ends meet and had joined a service fraternity in which I maintained two offices. The side effects from the medicine were debilitating at first. I remember one time having to get up at 4 a.m. for a fraternity meeting after just getting home from work around 12 or 1 in the morning. I was hardly able to make it to my phone to call out because of the crippling vertigo I was experiencing. Along with side effects of vertigo and constant fatigue, pursuing of many of my dreams have been complicated or even compromised as I have had to maintain a job to keep some form of insurance for my medication and doctor visits. Life goals like pursuing my dreams of being a working actor are put on hold as graduate school will probably only allow me to maintain a part-time job at most and booking an acting job is difficult unless I am sure that I can have health benefits or be able to afford outside health insurance. This has made many decisions extremely hard and more complicated to make than it is for many peers my age in the same situation.


HIV-vertigo-symptoms


As someone living with HIV for almost six years, I wish people living without that disease would understand that it is not a death sentence or a punishable crime. Being a part of the LGBTQ community, I have already witnessed enough unjust discrimination against my peers and have read of many instances of discrimination against people like me who live with HIV. Yes, many people contract HIV through their own mistakes, but this does not make them bad people or people undeserving of love and compassion. Any other terminal illness in existence is not treated with such cruelty and inhumanity as that of HIV. This action needs to be stopped and people like my peers and I need to helped, not hunted.


HIV-discrimination


 


The post Anonymous: What You Don’t Know About Living With HIV appeared first on STD Exposed – Sexual Health Blog.


link to source





If you think you have a STD, there is something you can do about it! The only way to know for sure is to be tested.


GET TESTED NOW. SEE TESTS & PRICES



This feature is for informational purposes only and should not be used to replace the care and information received from your health care provider. Please consult a health care professional with any health concerns you may have.



Anonymous: What You Don’t Know About Living With HIV

Friday, May 27, 2016

This ad suggests women are too busy thinking about puppies and high heels to take their birth control

Screen Shot 2016-05-27 at 11.05.22 AM

NuvaRing


Wow, being a woman these days is hard. I have so much on my mind it becomes overwhelming. In fact, I’m so busy thinking about hair appointments, cupcakes, puppies, and whether or not my boyfriend will propose that I don’t even have time to take my birth control. What’s a girl to do?


At least that’s how NuvaRing sees my life. In a new ad for the once-monthly birth control, NuvaRing tackles the burden that is a once daily pill. Now, don’t get me wrong, as someone who forgets to take the pill sometimes this isn’t a bad strategy, after all it is annoying to remember.


nuvaring2

Where NuvaRing went wrong is that in an ad meant to appeal to busy, modern women they represented those women as vapid air-heads whose only real obstacles during the day consist of high heels, puppies, and flowers. Like, how is daydreaming about flowers getting in the way of my birth control?


Screen Shot 2016-05-27 at 11.00.42 AMNuvaRing

Women on Reddit agreed. “I can’t believe it made it through an entire agency without anyone pointing out how it might be seen as a bit offensive,” wrote one Redditor.


Another added, “I think about flowers floating in the sky on a regular basis”.


Of course this isn’t to say that women don’t think about fashion and puppies. I freaking love puppies! But it would be nice if somewhere in that “busy” day of ours more substantial thoughts were at least mentioned like careers, classes, hobbies, or activism.


Screen Shot 2016-05-27 at 12.18.38 PMNuvaRing

After all, women are already battling stereotypes in the workplace in which they are viewed as less qualified than their male counterparts. So do we really need advertisers to present them as baked-good daydreamers? Isn’t that just giving more credence to pervasive, inaccurate stereotypes?


And it’s not just NuvaRing. Birth control commercials often feature common themes of dancing, frolicking, tutus, and weddings. As if when a women is “set free” from her womb she has nothing better to do than twirl around!


But here’s why it’s even more problematic. You may have noticed that reproductive rights have taken center stage these days, you know, as more and more of them keep disappearing. Companies are battling not to cover birth control, states are limiting access to abortion as we speak, and the GOP is in a constant war with Planned Parenthood. If we can’t even get a birth control company to take women’s issues seriously, how are we supposed to get the rest of the world to?


You can watch the ad on NuvaRing’s website.


link to source





If you think you have a STD, there is something you can do about it! The only way to know for sure is to be tested.


GET TESTED NOW. SEE TESTS & PRICES



This feature is for informational purposes only and should not be used to replace the care and information received from your health care provider. Please consult a health care professional with any health concerns you may have.



This ad suggests women are too busy thinking about puppies and high heels to take their birth control

Thursday, May 26, 2016

Why do we keep hiding plus-size women’s bodies on magazine covers?

160526-mc2

Marie Claire


You’ve probably heard someone describe another woman like this: “She has a really pretty face!”


While the woman in question may indeed have a pretty face, it’s often a polite euphemism for “she could stand to lose a few pounds.” Taking a glance at the way mainstream fashion magazines feature plus-size starlets, it’s clear that many ascribe to the idea of focusing on their faces to distract from their bodies.


The latest example: Actress Rebel Wilson will grace the cover of Marie Claire UK’s July issue, and the magazine published a preview of her cover shot. It’s a perfectly beautiful image of Wilson, but there’s just one problem. It cuts off at her bust, and she’s barely visible beneath long sleeves and a swoop of voluminous hair.


Other plus-size stars continually receive this treatment, so the question becomes: Why do these magazines feel the need to hide these women’s bodies?


Wilson stars in Pitch Perfect and Pitch Perfect 2 as Fat Amy, an a cappella singing oddball. In the first movie, she explains that she calls herself Fat Amy so skinny girls “don’t do it behind my back.” In real life, the Australian actress seems to have a similar comfort with her body.


In a November 2015 New York Times story about Wilson and her new plus-size fashion line, Rebelution, she talked about ditching tracksuits for more stylish fare on the runway. “You don’t really want to cover up just because you’re bigger,” she said. “You still want to show off what you’ve got, but in a classy way.” But after being on the cover of multiple publications, it’s obvious they’re leaning more towards covering her up.


The Marie Claire UK cover is just the most recent of a string of closeups. Wilson’s July 2013 Glamour UK cover shows her body obscured by a bubble bath; her September 2013 New York cover shows her from the bust up; and two different Elle covers give her the headshot treatment.


160526-magazines

And there are other mega-stars who don’t fit the sample size mold and have been relegated to a pretty face—and not much more.


Take Adele, the multi-Grammy and Academy Award-winning singer and songwriter. She’s been a cover girl many times over, but a glance at her impressive roundup of covers shows that a vast majority shied away from her body and focused on her face.


“I do have body image problems,” Adele said late last year at a Sirius XM event, “but I don’t let them rule my life, at all. And there’s bigger issues going on in the world than how I might feel about myself and stuff like that.”


Screen Shot 2016-05-26 at 3.05.25 PM

In October 2015, Elle celebrated its 25th anniversary with four different versions of the cover, featuring Megan Fox, Amanda Seyfried, Gabourey Sidibe, and Lauren Conrad. While Fox, Seyfried and Conrad had their full bodies shown, Sidibe’s cover was conspicuously different: it showed just her face. And to make matters worse, Elle was accused of lightening her skin color.


549e21fdbb4cb_-_elle-s-october-2010-cover-girls-lg (1)

We’ve also seen writer and actress Lena Dunham—who is famously comfortable with her body—pictured in extreme closeups on the covers of Vogue, Entertainment Weekly, Harper’s Bazaar (in which she posed topless for the same issue.) And body positive activists were up in arms when actress Melissa McCarthy was on the cover of Elle draped in an oversized coat, while other actresses in other versions of the 2013 “Women in Hollywood” issue cover were shown in much more body-baring shots.


Whitney Thore, star of TLC’s My Big Fat Fabulous Life and cover girl for brand new size-neutral health and fitness magazine FabUPlus, is frankly tired of the way fellow plus-size women are shown on newsstands. “I do definitely think there is a tendency to minimize plus size women so that we are flattered, and slimming,” Thore told me in a phone conversation.


Reflecting on Wilson and other plus-size stars who’ve been cut down to just a face, she sees why magazines do it, but says it doesn’t make it right. “It makes them more digestible and easier to handle so that people still want to buy the magazine. But what’s the point of putting her on your cover if you don’t want to celebrate her body?”


IMG_5280Whitney Thore

Thore regrets that these covers send a tired old message. “It piggybacks on what we’ve always heard: ‘You’re beautiful, but you ought to cover your stomach’…it’s not necessarily blatant, but as soon as you point it out, it really does send a message.”


No wonder a 2015 study conducted by Common Sense Media, a child advocacy group, found that children as young as 5-years-old express dissatisfaction with their bodies.


Ana Homayoun, author of “The Myth of the Perfect Girl: Helping Our Daughters Find Authentic Success and Happiness in School and Life,” spoke to CNN about the study and advised parents to question assumptions about the messages sent by media. “So any time there’s an example in media or just in real life, you build the muscles, if you will, in your kid … so that they can resist the messages that are coming at them.”


But how can we point to bodies that challenge these assumptions when there are so few visible by the supermarket checkout?


Wilson tweeted at Marie Claire UK for making her the July cover girl, not mentioning anything about the zoomed-in shot. What we need right now is to zoom out and look at how we can truly give plus-size stars their due.


link to source





If you think you have a STD, there is something you can do about it! The only way to know for sure is to be tested.


GET TESTED NOW. SEE TESTS & PRICES



This feature is for informational purposes only and should not be used to replace the care and information received from your health care provider. Please consult a health care professional with any health concerns you may have.



Why do we keep hiding plus-size women’s bodies on magazine covers?

This pro-life activist says it’s not his fault ‘if women end up dying from coat hangers’

Screen Shot 2016-05-26 at 4.45.55 PM

LifeTalkTV


It’s tragic but true: Women who live in places with more restrictive abortion policies are more likely to turn toward dangerous, do-it-yourself methods to terminate pregnancy. The trend can be seen worldwide according to the World Health Organization, which found that unsafe abortions occur at higher rates in countries with more restrictive laws.


Which makes the following story all the more disturbing.


On Monday, during an episode of Life Talk TV, well-known anti-abortion activist Mark Crutcher dismissed the idea that such restrictions lead to more dangerous abortions. Instead he claimed that any rise in DIY abortions is the fault of pro-choicers. Um, what?


“If abortion were outlawed today and next week a bunch of women died from coat hanger abortions, those coat hangers would have been in the hands of pro-choice people, not pro-life people,” Crutcher said.



He then added the following bizarre argument:


“The fact is if women wind up dying — every women that has ever died in an abortion, every woman that was ever was raped in an abortion clinic, was killed by a pro-abort or raped by a pro-abort. Why are we responsible for that?”



These callous remarks are ironic considering that Crutcher claims to champion life at all stages. Unless, of course, it’s the life of a woman who doesn’t want to be pregnant. Do we really need to say #PregnantLivesMatter?


Crutcher’s solution to the coat-hanger-abortion-problem was not to provide more safe access to abortion. Instead he suggested that women sign a piece of paper pledging not to perform their own abortions. “If you don’t like coat-hanger abortions, don’t do abortions,” he concluded, while completely missing the entire point of everything.


Sadly, Crutcher’s beliefs are all too common in this country and have helped pass numerous state laws that place often insurmountable obstacles in the way of abortion access. Just today South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley signed a bill banning abortions after 19 weeks, with no exceptions for survivors of rape or incest.


Missouri recently passed its controversial “personhood” bill which gives unborn fetuses the same constitutional rights as American citizens. Opponents argued the bill comes close to banning abortion entirely and also makes no exceptions in cases of rape or incest.


At the time, Missouri lawmaker Tila Hubrecht argued that in cases of rape pregnancy should be seen as a blessing from God. Meanwhile Republican State Rep. Jay Barnes boasted the law “puts Missouri in the position to be the most pro-life state in the country.”


self-induced-abortionNew York Times

It should be no surprise then that a New York Times investigation gave Missouri an “above average” rating in terms of Google searches for “home abortion methods.” South Carolina was also given a “hostile” rating by the Times, and subsequently, the state’s number of searches for DIY abortion methods was above average.


In other words, while politicians preach about saving the potential lives of unborn children, they completely ignore the lives of women. Keep up the good work, guys!


link to source





If you think you have a STD, there is something you can do about it! The only way to know for sure is to be tested.


GET TESTED NOW. SEE TESTS & PRICES



This feature is for informational purposes only and should not be used to replace the care and information received from your health care provider. Please consult a health care professional with any health concerns you may have.



This pro-life activist says it’s not his fault ‘if women end up dying from coat hangers’

How this campaign is using stunning photos of Muslim women to fight Islamophobia

#iammuslimUSA

Courtesy of People Against Suffering Oppression and Poverty (PASSOP)/ NATIVE VML


It’s hard to turn on the news these days without catching a whiff of the rotten stench of Islamophobia, whether it’s Trump saying we should ban all Muslim immigrants, a disturbing rise in hate crimes and bullying (even directed at Sikhs mistaken for Muslims), or avoiding women in hijabs or Middle Eastern men with beards. One group in South Africa, however, hopes to counter this wave of fear by reminding us that Muslims are also our friends and neighbors, and just asbeautiful, complex, and patriotic as ourselves.


Recently, digital marketing agency NATIVE VML partnered with People Against Suffering Oppression and Poverty (PASSOP), a not-for-profit organization devoted to fighting for the rights of asylum-seekers, refugees, and immigrants in South Africa, to create a campaign to combat the scourge of discrimination. Using the hashtag #IAmMuslim, the initiative has commissioned a series of powerful portraits of women draping themselves in the flags of their home countries. The portraits will be used in outdoor, print, and social media campaigns throughout Africa. As Muslim Coalition founder Saba Ahmed recently demonstrated by appearing on FOX News wearing an American flag hijab, a project like this can be a revolutionary act.


#IammuslimCourtesy of People Against Suffering Oppression and Poverty (PASSOP)/ NATIVE VML

“Juxtaposing these two symbols creates such a strong impact and challenges the assumptions people have about Muslim identity,” PASSOP’s Tendai Bhiza told Design Indaba.


#iammuslim britishsm-copyCourtesy of People Against Suffering Oppression and Poverty (PASSOP)/ NATIVE VML

“We are fully aware that certain quarters may find these images controversial, but the point of this movement is to challenge the prejudices people may have, and change the way we think about a culture that has been unjustly defined by the actions of a select few,” said Ryan McManus, Executive Creative Director at NATIVE VML, to Design Indaba.


#iammuslimFrench

Interestingly, in South Africa Muslims make up 1-2% percent of the population—many of whom have lived in the country for generations and are fully assimilated. It would seem like an unlikely nation for Islamophobia to flourish, but is perhaps the best situated to counter it. The campaign hopes that other countries dealing with extreme Islamophobia will also adopt the cause. As McManus told Design Indaba, “In this era of divisive rhetoric and rampant hate speech online, we need unifying images like these now more than ever.”


#iammuslimUSACourtesy of People Against Suffering Oppression and Poverty (PASSOP)/ NATIVE VML

link to source





If you think you have a STD, there is something you can do about it! The only way to know for sure is to be tested.


GET TESTED NOW. SEE TESTS & PRICES



This feature is for informational purposes only and should not be used to replace the care and information received from your health care provider. Please consult a health care professional with any health concerns you may have.



How this campaign is using stunning photos of Muslim women to fight Islamophobia

How to write a woke sex book

Screen Shot 2016-05-25 at 3.07.09 PM

Jordan Hemingway


I can’t help but flirt with Amy Rose Spiegel every time I see her. I shoot her coy looks and confident grins, I stand close, my “hellos” and “goodbyes” are lingering kisses. I may have even winked at her. Spiegel, in turn, is the finest flirt I’ve ever met—with a fleeting interaction, she can make one feel like the sun in a spinning solar system. But, to crib Spiegel’s own words, “I don’t mean ‘flirt’ as in ‘sleazily to bed’—that would be extremely troublesome in this context.” Spiegel, as she notes in her new and first book, “Action: A Book About Se,” is an advocate for flirting “with everyone and everything… noticing and communicating the shimmering qualities of life’s entities.”


This sort of invocation to full-bodied (and souled) engagement with the world and one’s place in it runs through “Action,” which was released earlier this month. The 25-year-old former Rookie editor has offered up a collage of a text, combining sex advice (as direct as “How to eat pussy” step-by-step); theory-peppered reflections on sexuality, identity and gender; and (very) personal anecdotes. It’s a messy book, because sex is a messy subject, and Spiegel aims to offer a lot of information and encouragement to young readers of any sexual orientation or gender identity.


It’s not high theory—it’s fast-paced and fun and should be required reading in high schools. Exclamation marks, italics, and capitalized letters abound. She’ll call the reader “dude,” insist that “LIFE RULES,” then will give an intro into Freudian and Foucaultian analysis of sex as discourse. Then she’ll explain a cool thing to do to a dick with the palm of your hand.


I spoke to my friend and flirt partner via email about the challenges of giving advice, undoing categories, and her alter-ego named “Small Deluxe.”


NL: Which sort of sex advice genres, or sex writing, were you trying to counterpose with “Action”? There’s a lot of brilliant feminist and queer theory focused on sex, but rarely does it come in advice form. Why do you think this is?


ARS: Most people aren’t reading theory in their day-to-day lives. I grew up a queer feminist—but I didn’t know I was at the time, because I was pretty poor and living in a community that wasn’t inclined to acknowledge that identity as valid, let alone worthy of respectful, curious discourse. I didn’t consider myself a feminist until I went to college. Many people never have those two experiences, but they’re still interested in healthy, blissed-out fucking, and they should be able to learn about it in conversational, open terms. It was important to me to try and find the most straightforward terms with which to discuss sexual concepts. I didn’t want to instill a sense of exclusion in people who might be unfamiliar with certain verbiage, but who would ultimately agree with or be interested in what it describes.


In assuming that everyone possesses the same vocabularies surrounding sex, discussions about sexual liberation becomes the would-be territory of only the urbane, formally educated classes. This means it becomes white-, wealth-, and male-dominated, in keeping with that social stratum on the whole.


action book cover

NL: What concerns did you have about writing a sex advice book?


ARS: My main concern here was class and inclusion: making sure that, no matter a reader’s sexual politics, identity, background, or interest, they could come away with a baseline understanding of how different people might communicate about fucking, and what it means, regardless of whether the reader had desire-based commonalities with them. I wanted to write “Action” as a sort of stepping stone: Maybe a reader isn’t familiar with certain topics, writers, or ideologies, but will seek them out after being introduced to them here.


NL: Can you talk a little about the challenges of trying to write for readers from an array of subject positions, which you do in “Action”? A lot of sex writing seems to assume, or directly address, a specific assumed reader identity—young, cis, straight women, for example; or just gay men.


ARS: As a person who has now, professionally, been in an array of positions, I’m fascinated by the similarities of humans who are getting laid, as much as I am the differences. Regardless of how you manifest it, and with total acknowledgement of and love to the complications identity can present (for everyone!): Our shared main obligation, on the whole, is to be kind, listen, and respect one another with enormous intent and openness. Figuring out how to best express this to each and every new person you get with might seem burdensome, since it takes a new form every time. It’s not. It leads to this shitty erosion of quality and self if you choose to go about it the other way, and why would you choose to have a bad time when the alternative is a distinctive/hot-as-fuck experience?


NL: You include a lot of caveats and qualifications in the book, always with flare that makes it very readable. For example, you give a piece of advice and then write something like “(or not, if you don’t want).” You often parenthesize and qualify if something seems to exclude certain groups of people or types of desires. And you often use “they” as a singular pronoun, as a way to navigate talking about people without assuming a gender. Was this something you did as you wrote, or was it about editing for care?


ARS: That’s how I write, although I agonized over the decision to say “the person with the penis/vagina” instead of “they” or other pronouns. I decided that readers would understand the usage of “they” in the sections where this felt like an issue. This was not the result of that middle-school-substitute-English-teacher-ass sentiment that goes, “What about GRAMMAIRE?” as an (anti-trans) way to exclude “they” as a singular pronoun. I love when bigoted pedants, on the merit of supposedly being devout Strunk/Whites, pretend they cannot understand ONE WORD used almost exactly as it is otherwise. It’s like, I thought you were supposed to be very, very smart!


NL: What’s the dumbest sex advice you’ve ever read/heard?


“Nah, you should definitely have sex with a guy named Gilbert who just took you to Planet Hollywood ‘for dessert,”’ said my own brain. Still, I think I was right.


NL: I notice how you, when talking about you personal choices, prefer to use negating terms, e.g. non-monogamous as opposed to polyamorous, “shucking off” orientation, rather than choosing a descriptor bisexual etc. And you use “queer” as a catch all for this sort of negating effort. Can you discuss this approach of undoing identity?


ARS: Identifying in specific terms benefits many people practically (finding like-minded friends and partners; finding safe social groups) and personally. In my case, I find saying that I’m bisexual, or gender-fluid, or whatever I feel like to have the opposite effect: Trying to pin down what my gender/sexuality is feels limiting to me. I hate being told what or who I am—this has never done me an ounce of good in any area of my life; hearing “what I’m like” just makes me second-guess my actions. I prefer to just go about my business as the bizarro blonde menace typing this to you today.


I prefer to have conversations about sex and gender that are reciprocal, nuanced, and personal, and these qualifiers don’t feel personal as applied to me. I’m also hesitant to use them because my relationships with sex and gender rearrange themselves a lot, so why bother printing up a nametag for a bad part-time employee who’s just going to throw it on the counter and tell you to shove it tomorrow?


NL: There’s a lot of “be yourself”, “be who you are” sort of advice in the book. But there is also a recognition that who one is—who we are now—and what our desires are, are shaped and coded by a lot of normative social and historical forces, patriarchy and capitalism fiercely among them. How do you square those two things?


ARS: The social configuration and mores which a person is surrounded by are definitely intertwined with how they fuck—while it would be convenient and highly rad if that were the one area of life that was unaffected by societal grossness, this is sadly not the case. In the book, I wrote about social structures as they relate to sex most overtly in the segments about gender, presentation, pornography, fetishes, and promiscuity. (Heh: “In the book, I wrote about this most overtly in the entire book,” quoth this moron.) It’s useful to examine why you want something beyond the simple awareness that you want it. Once you have a handle on the outside forces that affect why you might want to express a certain kind of desire, and/or where that desire appears to bifurcate from the rest of your worldview, you might begin to think about those desires differently—effectively, changing their shape in your head without changing their shape in your bed by making them into positive, edifying vehicles for inquiry. (And for coming really hard.)


NL: Tell me about Small Deluxe!


ARS: For anyone reading this who doesn’t have a dumb, sweet nickname for themselves: I recommend it. It was the answer to the strange logical equation that starts with the advice—we’ve all encountered it—don’t worry about what other people think of you. That always implied, to me, that there was a particular impression I was leaving to begin with, and I had no idea what that might be. I decided to make her up myself: Who did I want to be in the world? What was she like? What does she do, say, wear? (Promotional T-shirts from a car dealership in her hometown and tiny cutoff shorts, as it turns out.) Whenever I get nervous or am unsure what to do, I place Small Deluxe in my situation and just imitate her. It rules and it works.


NL: Here’s something I was reflecting on while reading “Action”: Some of the most important and opening sexual experiences I’ve had, I’ve perhaps wanted to want something, but not known if that thing is actually what I do want. The first time I slept with a woman, having grown up heterotypically, or my first threesome, or sex when I was very young with much older men. I would not advise this sort of liminal consent type sex, but nor do I personally regret it. It is arguably the fraught nature of experimentation that fully wanting or desiring an experience cannot precede having first had it. Like, who knew I like eating pussy? I didn’t assume it, and was socially coded such that I had much thought about it until my early twenties.


This is of course common for a cis woman growing up “straight” in a heteronormative, albeit liberal social sphere. But I’ve also had some scarring, highly consensual, at-the-time desirable sex. Let’s call it regrettable sex. This is usually related to choosing the wrong partners. I’ve never quite known how to navigate discussing non-regrettable instances of questionable consent, and regrettable instances when everything was “done right.” A book of advice is not the place for that. But I’m be interested in your thoughts on that here.


ARS: Sex is an agent of change. It can unexpectedly morph your worldview in worthy, interesting ways, as with forms of experimentation you weren’t previously anticipating, and less great ones, like consensual sex that leaves at least one person involved in it wishing it hadn’t happened later on down the line.


Having a clear understanding of wanting to explore a new sexual premise doesn’t necessarily have to precede that actual act, so long as, in that act, you and your partner are agreeing to experiencing it together in real time. As with all matters of consent, it’s about the present more so than it is any preconception of “what’s okay” between you and your sexual partner(s). My first threesome happened out of nowhere—it was an evening like any other at the nightclub where I used to hostess, and the next thing I know, I’m heading back home having invited this cute-looking couple over. Although it wasn’t how I was expecting to end my evening, I was open to it, and we checked in throughout to make sure everyone was into it.


When it comes to sex in which consent was given, but the encounter sucked anyway: That happens! There’s no way to instruct your heart about what the right way to feel about other people might be, regardless of whether you’ve “done everything correctly.” As I mentioned is true of the past, consent also can’t be dictated by what happens after the fact. It guarantees only that each participant is okay right then and there. Prioritizing it each time you have sex sure as hell helps alleviate any additional stress, trauma, or hardship a person might feel about a not-great entanglement, though.


NL: What would you say is the central tenet of your advice?


ARS: Love and do what you will, and don’t feel obligated to give your own version of Small Deluxe a name that sounds culled from the dollar menu.


link to source





If you think you have a STD, there is something you can do about it! The only way to know for sure is to be tested.


GET TESTED NOW. SEE TESTS & PRICES



This feature is for informational purposes only and should not be used to replace the care and information received from your health care provider. Please consult a health care professional with any health concerns you may have.



How to write a woke sex book